10 
ADDENDA AND CORRIGENDA 
In addition to the species above, for which specific 
Burmese records have been found, there are other species 
which are likely to occur there. In some cases there are 
records from countries on either side, but no explicit 
records from Burma. In other cases the known distributions 
of the snakes approach Burmese borders on one or more sides, 
but have not been recorded from Burma proper. In particular 
this is true of a number of species found in southern 
Thailand (Taylor, 1965), but which have not been reported 
from Tenasserim (e€.g., Bungarus candidus, Maticora 
intestinalis, Calloselesma rhodostoma) . 
The list below provides information on possible 
additions to the fauna and also offers comments on records 
that appear to be in error. 
Ahaetulla mycterizans (Linnaeus, 1758) 
BURMA RECORDS: NONE, but occurs in Thailand at the 
Isthmus of Kra and may be found in Tenasserim. 
Ahaetulla perroteti Dumeril & Bibron, 1854. 
BURMA RECORDS: Pegu (ZSIC 12378). The specimen is 
correctly identified, but the locality is questioned 
on the label. Inasmuch as this species is restricted 
to southern India, the locality is undoubtedly in 
error. 
Amphiesma beddomei (Guenther, 1864). 
BURMA RECORDS: Chin Hills: Haka (BNHS 1595). This 
species is restricted to southern India. The specimen 
is probably misidentified. 
Atretium yunnanensis Anderson, 1879. 
BURMA RECORDS: NONE, but the genus is known from India 
and western Yunnan. “It is likely®to occur in: Burma‘ 
Bungarus candidus (Linnaeus, 1758). 
BURMA RECORDS: NONE, but this Malayan species has been 
found above the Isthmus of Kra in adjacent Thailand, 
and should be looked for in Tenasserim. 
Calloselesma rhodostoma (Boie, 1827). 
BURMA RECORDS: NONE, but the species occurs in adjacent 
Thailand, both above and below the Isthmus of kKra, 
and should be found in Tenasserim. 
Cylindrophis maculatus (Linnaeus, 1758) 
BURMA RECORDS: "Burma" (USNM 129693). The specimen is 
correctly identified, but this species is found only 
in Ceylon, so the locality data are undoubtedly in 
error. 
