Rk. Shelford, New Blattidae. 119 
Phyllodromia translucida sp. n. 
¢. Rufo-testaceous. Pronotum transversely elliptic, posteriorly 
truncate; lateral margins broadly hyaline. Tegmina hyaline, 
reticulated, veins white, interstices filled with rufo - testaceous ; 
marginal field broad, 11 costals the last two ramose, discoidal 
sectors oblique, posterior ulnar vein simple. Wings with veins, 
apex and marginal field rufo-testaceous; radial vein bifurcate 
from base, the upper branch giving rise to 4 costals, the lower 
branch giving rise to 3, the first five costals incrassated at apex, 
the last three ramose, ulnar vein 5-ramose, a triangular apical 
area, 1** axillary vein 4-ramose. Supra-anal lamina transverse, 
very shortly produced; sub-genital lamina with apex deeply and 
narrowly cleft, a short slender style on either side of the cleft. 
Cerci moderate, pointed. [Front femora missing.] 
Total length 14,5 mm; length of body 12 mm; length of 
tegmina 12 mm; pronotum 3 mm >< 4 mm. 
1 g, Cameroons (Conradty). 
The nearest ally of the species is P. pustulosa Gerst. but it 
differs from that by its larger size and by the absence of 
castaneous dots from the tegmina. 
Phyllodromia erythronotata sp. n. 
Q. Closely allied to P. albovariegata mihi from Fernando Po, 
but differs in the following points: — Head entirely rufous. Pro- 
notum rufo-testaceous with broad lateral vittae castaneous, lateral 
margins hyaline. Tegmina with 10 costals, last two branched. 
Wings with 9 costals, costal margin not flavid, apical triangle 
small. Sub-genital lamina at apex carinate, cleft. Cerci castaneous 
at base. 
Total length 9,1 mm; length of body 6,3 mm; length of 
tegmina 7,3 mm; pronotum 2 mm >< 2,1 mm. 
1 9, Cameroons (Conradt). 
It is probable that the males of these two species differ 
from each other more than do the females and hence I think it 
advisable for the present to keep the two species separate. 
Genus Liosilpha Stal. 
I have recently had an opportunity of examining the type 
of Liosilpha pumicata Stal and there can be no doubt that the 
species is not congeneric with Phyllodromia germanica L.; it enters 
more naturally the genus Pseudectobia Sauss. as re-defined by me 
[Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (7) XIX p. 36 (1907)]; but I find (1) 
that Lupparia Wik. antedates Pseudectobia Sauss. (2) that Liosilpha 
