10 Rev. T, R. R. Stebbing on Ainphipodous Crustacea. 



Fig. 16. Diplograptus mucronatus, Hall, with marginal fibres. Newham, 

 near Lancefield. 



Fig. 17. Diplograptus mucronatus, Hall, with marginal fibres. Watchbox 

 Ranges, near Baynton's. 



Fig. IS. Diplograptus prims?, Hisinger. Newham, near Lancefield. The 

 cellules are somewhat too distinctly represented in this figure. 



Fig. 19. Didgmograptus ? fniticosus, Hall. Castlemaine, county of Tal- 

 bot. Three only of the four stipes are here seen. 



Fig. 20. Didgmograptus nitidus, Hall. Castlemaine. 



Fig. 21. Didgmograptus Pantoni?, M'Coy. Spring Plains, Redesdale. 

 Showing the upper portion of two stipes. 



Fig. 22. Didgmograptus Pantoni ?, M'Coy. Spring Plains, Redesdale. 

 Showing one stipe, and portion of the other, with radicle. 



Fig. 23. Graptolithus lotus, M'Coy. Watchbox Ranges, near Baynton's. 



Fig. 24. Graptolithus tenuis ?, Portlock. Newham, near Lancefield. 



Note. — The figures are all drawn as near as possible to the natural size. 

 I am much indebted to my friend Mr. B. N. Peach for his careful delinea- 

 tion of the specimens. 



II. — Amphipodous Crustacea. A new Species, and some 

 Items of Description and Nomenclature. By the Rev. T. 

 R. R. Stebbing, M.A. 



[Plates I. & II.] 



Liljehorgia Normanni, n. sp. PI. I. figs. 1, la, lb, 1c. 



This species comes very near to Liljehorgia shetlandica, 

 discovered by the Rev. A. M. Norman ; and I have taken the 

 liberty of naming it in honour of that very distinguished car- 

 cinologist. Both pairs of gnathopoda agree very closely with 

 the figures and descriptions given by Bate and Westwood of 

 those members in L. shetlandica. In the first pair, however, 

 the finger of the new species is longer, and has a serrated 

 edge ; in the second pair the hand, instead of being only 

 fringed with hair, is very prettily covered with it. The coxse 

 of the fifth and sixth pairs of legs are deeper than those figured 

 for L. shetlandica ; and the thighs of the fifth pair, instead of 

 being equal to those of the sixth and seventh, are considerably 

 smaller. 



The lenses of the eyes are not numerous, though the eyes 

 are large — which accords with the description given of the 

 genus, though the eyes of L. shetlandica are stated to be small. 

 The magnitude of the eyes is in many species of sessile-eyed 

 Crustacea a very variable character. 



The head has a rather deep slit below the lobe on which 



