Records of Dees. 347 



Wings quite clear^ stigma and nervures fuscous ; first r. n. 

 meeting first t.-c. Abdomen shining, with extremely feeble 

 and minute scattered punctures, 



? . — Variety jugata, v. n. With a transverse approxi- 

 mately kidney-shaped supraclypeal mark, the notch on the 

 lower side; a yellow spot near each anterior corner of meso- 

 tliorax, and a yellow dot on tegulse. The clypeus is obscurely 

 reddish. 



Hab. Kalamunda, S.W. Australia, Feb. 9-28, 1914 (i^. E. 

 Turner). British Museum. 



In my table of Australian Prosojjis this runs to 18^ and 

 runs out because it is much smaller than P. perp/exa, and 

 has a yellow patch behind tubercles. Mr. Turner obtained 

 males of Prosopis elongata. Smith, at Kalamunda ; super- 

 ficially elongnta much resembles the new species, but on 

 closer examination it is seen not to be very closely allied. 



Prosopis fulvicornis, Smith. 



Kalamunda, Feb. 9-28, 19 U-; 1 S («• 1^- Turner). 



This agrees with Smith's description of P. fulvicornis 

 (which was discovered from the Baly collection, and was not 

 in the British Museum), except for the fact that the lateral 

 face-marks extend broadly halfway up the front, so that the 

 whole yellow area of the head rather resembles (though too 

 broad) a donUey^s head with erect ears. The large and 

 ])road supraclypeal mark is notched above j the yellow mark 

 behind the tul)ercles is crescentic. Smith's short description 

 is otherwise very characteristic. 



This falls nearest to P. ]mrp7irata, 8m., but is smaller, 

 and diffei's in some details of the markings. It cannot be 

 tiie male of P. kalamundce, the sculpture being entirely 

 different. 



Pachyprosopis hamatostoma, Cockerell. 



Kalamunda, Feb. 9-28, 1914 {R. E. Turner) ; 3 ? . 



AVitli these are sent two males of P. aurantipes, Ckll., 

 with the same data ; and if I do not mistake the meaning of 

 the label on one of the P. hcematostoma, it is to be under- 

 stood that the two are sexes of one species. If this is correct, 

 it is very remarkable, as they differ extremely in colour and 

 general appearance. The P. hcematostoma are duller, not so 

 blue as the original types. 



