THE ANNALS 
AND 
MAGAZINE OF NATURAL HISTORY, 
[SIXTH SERIES. ] 
No. 51. MARCH 1892, 
XXX.—British Fossil Crinoids.—VI. Botryocrinus quin- 
quelobus, sp. nov., Wenlock Limestone; and Note on 
Botryocrinus pinnulatus. By F. A. Barner, M.A., F.G.S. 
[Plate XI. figs. 1 & 2.) 
EXAMINATION of the numerous British species referred at 
one time or another to Cyathocrinus has brought to light one 
that certainly does not belong to the genus, but appears refer- 
able to Botryocrinus. ‘That this species was not recognized 
in time to incorporate its description in the preceding paper is 
due partly to the fact that the anal area is not exposed in 
either of the only known specimens, but chiefly to the unfor- 
tunate necessity I am under of examining the specimens in 
the Woodwardian Museum, where these are placed, by flying 
“ visits, few and far between.” 
Botryocrinus quinquelobus, sp. n. 
1873. Cyathocrinus quinquangularis, Phill., apud J. W. Salter, ‘Cata- 
logue of Cambrian and Silurian Fossils &c., Cambridge, p. 123. 
Non ead qunquangularis, J.S. Miller, ‘Nat. Hist. Crinoidea,’ 
. 92 (1821). 
Nou Cyathocrinus quinquangularis, Miller, apud J, Phillips, ‘ Geology 
of Yorkshire,’ pt. ii. p. 206 (1836). 
Non Rhodocrinus(?) quinquangularis (Miller), apud J. Phillips, in 
Murchison’s ‘ Silurian System,’ pl. xviii. fig. 5 (1839). 
Non Cyathocrinus quinquangularis, Eichwald, ‘Silurische System in 
Estland,’ p. 173 (1840). 
Ann, & Mag. N. Hist. Ser. 6. Vol. ix. 14 
