Rev. A. M. Norman on the Submarine-Cable Fauna. 171 
Galathea 
Bate. 
Amphithopsis latipes (Sars) = Calliope Ossiant and C. Fingalli, 
B. & W.: abundant. Sars’s specific name has precedence 
of those of Bate and Westwood, whose C. Osstani and 
C. Fingalli are undoubtedly but one species. The late 
Axel Boeck * has placed this Amphipod in his genus Am- 
phithopsis, separating it from C. leviuscula, which remains 
the type of the genus Calhopius, Lilljeborg (= Calliope, 
Bac WV). 
Gammaropsis erythrophthalmus, Lilljeborg, = Eurystheus ery- 
thropthalmus, B. & W.: one specimen. 
Probolium (= Montagua, Bate): fragment, too imperfect for 
identification. 
Atgina phasma (Montagu) = Protella phasma, Bate, 
Munna: fragment. 
Loxoconcha multifora (Norman). 
Cytheropteron nodosum, Brady. 
Schlerochilus contortus (Norman). 
Paradoxostoma variabile (Baird). 
ensiforme, Brady. 
?: fragment of carapace, I think G. dispersa, 
POLYZOA. 
Diastopora obelia (Fleming). 
Idmonea atlantica, Forbes. 
Salicornaria farciminotdes (Ellis & Sol.). 
Mippothoa catenularia (Jameson). 
— divaricata, Lamx. The typical form. 
—— divaricata, var. carinata, Norman. Pl. XII. figs. 4-7. 
A remarkable form, procured from this source, and which 
I have also dredged in Birterbuy Bay, is worthy of a name, 
and is figured (Pl. XII. figs.4~7). It has all the cells, as 
well as the intercellular tubules, strongly carinated, and 
* The death of this able Scandinavian naturalist at an early age is a 
great loss to science. His contributions to the study of the Crustacea 
Amphipoda and Copepoda are all most valuable. The prodromus (‘Crus- 
tacea Amphipoda borealia et arctica’) which he published in 1870 marks 
a new starting-point in the investigation of this subclass, and contains 
by far the most scientific arrangement of the sessile-eyed Crustacea which 
has as yet appeared. The first part of his larger work, ‘ De Skandinaviske 
og Arktiske Amphipoder,’ 1872, raised hopes of a most complete mono- 
graph on the subject on which it treats; but death has stepped in to rob 
us of the fulfilment of those hopes. Herr Axel Boeck’s executors inform 
me that the MS. and drawings will be, it is hoped, capable of arrange- 
ment so as to allow the issue of a second part of this Monograph; but 
although a mass of other drawings remain, there are not the MS. or notes 
to enable them to be utilized. 
