486 Mr. B. P. Uvarov—Records and 
12. Ceracris deflorata, Br. Watt. 
1893. Duronia deflorata, Br. Watt., Ann. Mus. Genova, xxxiii. p. 126. 
1914. Ceracris deflorata, Kirby, Fauna Br, India, Acrid. p. 112. 
1914. Phleoba einctalis, Kirby, /. ce. p. 105. no, 120. 
The identity of cinctalis, Kirby, with deflorata, Br. Waitt., 
is hardly in doubt, since the most careful examination of 
the type reveals no difference from Brunner’s description. 
It is strange that Kirby, who redescribed the genus Ceracris, 
Walk., and quite correctly included in it deflorata, Br. 
Watt., put his cinctalis in the genus Phleoba, with which it 
has very little relationship. 
A number of specimens from Pusa and Chapra. 
To the same genus Ceracris belong also Kuthya leta, Bol. 
(l.c. p. 79), from China, and Parapleurus armillatus, Karny 
(Suppl. Entom. iv. 1915, p. 83), from Formosa, the former 
being very close to, if not identical with, deflorata, Br. W. 
A revision of this genus will be given by me elsewhere. 
13. Phleoba angustidorsis, Bol. 
Lebong, 5000’, ix. 1908, 1 3,5 2 9. 
One specimen has been erroneously named by Kirby 
as Ph. panteli, Bol. It is very probable that this species 
is identical with Phleoba antennata, Br. Watt., in which 
case the latter name must be applied to it. 
14. Phleoba infumata, Br. Watt. 
Pusa, 7. viii. 1907, 10-26. viii. 1906 ; Cuttuck, xi. 1905. 
15. Phleoba panteli, Bol. 
Pusa, 23, yin. 19075 1 os 162 190851 =. 
The synonymy of this species, given by Kirby in the 
‘Fauna,’ is right. 
Subfamily Locusrivz. 
16. Lerina edipodioides, Bol. 
Several specimens without precise locality. 
The position of this genus seems to me rather doubtful, 
since its distinctly reclinate front and its elytra, hyaline 
and sparsely venulated throughout, do not agree with the 
characters of Locustinz, and seem to indicate a relationship 
with Avolopus. 
17. Gastrimargus transversus, Thunbg. 
Pusa, 23. ix. 1906. 
