220 ANNUAL REPORT SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION, 1957 



than less disciplined study in both fields, and runs counter to the 

 current educational trends. 



NOTES 



(1) George Sarton, The History of Science and the New Humanism, p. 11, 



Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1937. 



(2) Ibid., p. 54. 



(3) C. E. K. Mees, The Path of Science, p. 15. New York. 



(4) J. B. Bury, The Idea of Progress, New York, 1932. 



(5) C. E. K. Mees, The Path of Science, p. 13. New York. 



(6) Report of Poll No. 45, The Purdue Opinion Panel, July 1956. Division of 



Educational Reference, Purdue University. 



(7) Harrison Brown, The Challenge of Man's Future, p. 49. New York, 1954. 



(8) The articles referred to are: J. A. Stratton, Science and the educated 



man, Physics Today, April 1956. 



C. F. Rassweiler, Producing more technical man power, Technology Re- 

 view, May 1956. 



H. G. Rickover, Engineering and scientific education, Technology Review, 

 April 1956. 



H. G. Rickover, The education of our talented children, Thomas Edison 

 Foundation, November 1956. 



Arthur Bestor, We are less educated than 50 years ago, U. S. News & 

 World Report, November 30, 1956. 



Arnold O. Beckman, A business man's view of the failure of education, 

 U. S. News & World Report, November 30, 1956. 



(9) Dr. Glenn Frank, late President of the University of Wisconsin. 



(10) The standard-of -living data are from a recent Brookings Institution study. 

 The increment shows the increase in average standard of living due to 

 a redistribution, or leveling, of income of all kinds, salaries, rents, 

 dividends, etc. 



Reprints of the various articles in this Report may be obtained, as long 

 as the supply lasts, on request addressed to the Editorial and Publications 

 Division, Smithsonian Institution, Washington 25, D. C. 



