NEW PUBLICATIONS. 209 
Agaricus bulbosus viridis. To some of the species, no scientific name 
is given (merely the popular one) ; and when the scientific names are 
given, the name of the founder of the species is frequently omitted. It 
is to be understood, therefore, that where we have omitted authors’ 
names, we have merely followed Dr. Valenti-Serini. 
Tab. 4. Fig. 1. Amanita Vitoni. As this Agaric is shown with 
brown gills, it is probably not an Amanita. 
Tab. 4. Fig. 2. Amanita Terrea (o pseud-Amanita) has dark brown 
gills, and ovvio. if the colouring is correct, cannot be an Amanita. 
Fig. 1. Amanita fulva. Fig. 9. Amanita cinerea = forms 
of Agaricus pantherinus, DC. 
Tab. 6 et 7. Agaricus fulvaster and A. plumbeus. Probably forms 
of A. Cecilie, Berk. an r. Both these varieties are common in the 
neighbourhood of London. 
Tab. 8. Volvaria Corticelli. Volvaria here, like Amanita above, is 
raised to the position of a genus; the curious Agaric represented in 
the plate has whi¢e gills, not pink, as might have been expected from 
the name. 
Tab. 9. Agaricus virgatus is an indifferent representation of 4. vol- 
vaceus, Bull., or the ** Stov Agaric " as we call it in uM accord- 
ing to Dr. Valenti-Serini. 
Tab. 13. Z. perlatus. The same species as shown on Tab. 6. 
- Tab. 14. 4. margariliferus— A. pantherinus, DC. 
Tab. 15. 4. maculatus (!). Totally different from 4. maculatus, 
A. and S., and belonging to a different section of Agaricus. Probably 
forms of the species shown on Tab. 6 and 13. 
Tab. 16. 4. verrucosus, Bull.— A. pantherinus, DC. 
Tab. 17. Æ. Hydnocephalus. A bad representation of A. aculesqua- 
mosus, Weinm. 
Tab. 18. Fig. 2. 4. ulmarius (?).—Fig. 5. A. rimosus, Bull. Per- 
haps correct. 
Tab. 19. Æ. lacrimabundus, Bull. Very poor and incorrect repre- 
sentation. 
Tab. 20. Fig. 1, 4. nanus (?). 
Tab. 21. Fig. 1. Æ. Peronatus, Bolt. A grotesque caricature of 
Marasmius peronatus, Fr. 
Tab. 22. 4. mutabilis, Scheff. May be this species, or 4. melleus, 
Vahl, but is not like either. 
