﻿NO. 
  1966. 
  8YN0P8I8 
  OF 
  NEOTROPICAL 
  LIMNOBINJE— 
  ALEXANDER. 
  487 
  

  

  3. 
  Stegasmonotus 
  (p. 
  11) 
  equals 
  Tanypremna 
  Ostcn 
  Sackeii. 
  

   {Tipula 
  longipes 
  Fabricius 
  (p. 
  13) 
  is 
  certaiiily 
  a 
  Tanypremna.) 
  

  

  4. 
  Pelilkea 
  (p. 
  15), 
  apparently 
  a 
  good 
  genus, 
  based, 
  principally, 
  on 
  

   the 
  strong 
  supernumerary 
  cross-vein 
  in 
  cell 
  M. 
  

  

  5. 
  Phacelodocera 
  (p. 
  26) 
  equals 
  Ptilogyna. 
  The 
  differences 
  be- 
  

   tween 
  this 
  and 
  the 
  Australian 
  Ptilogynse 
  are 
  not 
  sufficient 
  for 
  generic 
  

   separation. 
  

  

  6. 
  Tipulodina 
  (p. 
  30), 
  not 
  a 
  Pedicine, 
  but 
  unquestionably 
  a 
  

   Tipuline 
  as 
  shown 
  by 
  the 
  position 
  of 
  Scj, 
  shape 
  of 
  cell 
  Cu^, 
  etc. 
  

  

  7. 
  Androclosma 
  (pp. 
  34-37, 
  49); 
  not 
  different 
  from 
  Arrhenica, 
  

   proposed 
  by 
  Osten 
  Sacken 
  for 
  A. 
  spinosa 
  Osten 
  Sacken. 
  Mr. 
  Ed- 
  

   wards 
  informs 
  me 
  that 
  A. 
  ornatum 
  has 
  a 
  strange 
  resemblance 
  to 
  a 
  

   species 
  of 
  Maci'omastix, 
  from 
  New 
  Zealand. 
  

  

  8. 
  Psaronius 
  (p. 
  50) 
  equals 
  Lecteria 
  Osten 
  Sacken. 
  I 
  have 
  both 
  

   of 
  Enderlein's 
  species, 
  Dactylolabis 
  conspersa 
  (p. 
  49) 
  and 
  Psaronius 
  

   lituratus 
  (equals 
  Lecteria 
  obscura 
  Fabricius). 
  I 
  believe 
  that 
  the 
  

   presence 
  or 
  absence 
  of 
  tibial 
  spurs 
  is 
  a 
  character 
  that 
  is 
  overdone, 
  as 
  

   closely 
  related 
  species 
  tend 
  to 
  be 
  separated 
  by 
  it. 
  

  

  9. 
  Aldrovandia 
  (p. 
  52), 
  not 
  Eriopterine, 
  but 
  undoubtedly 
  a 
  

   Tipuline. 
  

  

  10. 
  Clydonodozus 
  (p. 
  57). 
  Mr. 
  Edwards 
  writes: 
  "I 
  should 
  doubt 
  

   very 
  much 
  if 
  Clydonodozus 
  can 
  be 
  retained 
  as 
  distinct 
  from 
  Conosia." 
  

  

  11. 
  Mongomella 
  (p. 
  61) 
  equals 
  Mongoma 
  Westwood. 
  The 
  follow- 
  

   ing 
  errata 
  in 
  venational 
  interpretation: 
  M. 
  cariniceps 
  (p. 
  60, 
  fig. 
  L^), 
  

   vein 
  R2+3 
  should 
  be 
  Rg; 
  vein 
  Mj 
  should 
  be 
  R4+5 
  ; 
  Mg 
  should 
  be 
  

   M1+2; 
  the 
  same 
  applies 
  to 
  21. 
  gracilis 
  (p. 
  62, 
  fig. 
  M^), 
  which 
  is 
  closely 
  

   related 
  to 
  M. 
  zamhesix 
  Alexander 
  from 
  East 
  Africa. 
  

  

  12. 
  Pycnocrepis 
  (p. 
  65) 
  equals 
  Styringomyia 
  Loew. 
  

  

  13. 
  Stihadocera 
  (p. 
  83) 
  is 
  very 
  doubtfully 
  Cyhndrotomine; 
  the 
  

   presence 
  of 
  Scj 
  and 
  obliteration 
  of 
  Sc^ 
  is 
  a 
  Tipuline 
  character. 
  The 
  

   wide 
  separation 
  at 
  the 
  wing-margin 
  of 
  Rj 
  and 
  R2+3 
  is 
  not 
  at 
  all 
  

   Cylindrotomine. 
  The 
  position 
  of 
  this 
  very 
  curious 
  genus 
  must 
  remain 
  

   in 
  doubt 
  until 
  related 
  forms, 
  or 
  more 
  material, 
  are 
  discovered. 
  An 
  

   examination 
  of 
  the 
  male 
  genitalia 
  would 
  tell 
  whether 
  or 
  not 
  the 
  

   species 
  belong 
  to 
  the 
  Cylindrotominae. 
  

  

  New 
  names 
  proposed. 
  — 
  The 
  following 
  new 
  names 
  are 
  given 
  to 
  cer- 
  

   tain 
  of 
  the 
  species 
  occurring 
  in 
  the 
  list 
  in 
  part 
  2. 
  The 
  same 
  combi- 
  

   nation 
  of 
  generic 
  and 
  specific 
  terms 
  necessitates 
  the 
  renaming 
  of 
  the 
  

   later 
  species. 
  

  

  Geranomyia 
  enderleini, 
  new 
  name 
  for 
  G. 
  annulata 
  Enderlein 
  (1912); 
  

   not 
  G. 
  annulata 
  Skuse 
  (1888) 
  (Dipt. 
  Aust,, 
  pt. 
  7, 
  p. 
  70). 
  

  

  Geranomyia 
  philippii, 
  new 
  name 
  for 
  G. 
  virescens 
  Philippi 
  (1865); 
  

   not 
  6^. 
  virescens 
  Loew. 
  (1851). 
  

  

  Furcomyia 
  cMlensis, 
  new 
  name 
  for 
  Limnohia 
  guttata 
  Philippi 
  

   (1865); 
  not 
  L. 
  guttata 
  Meigen 
  (1838) 
  (=Linnophila 
  marmorata 
  

   Meigen) 
  . 
  

  

  