22 THE MEDITEREANEAN FEUIT-FLY. 



1899. Preliminary report of the State Board of Horticulture. California, 1S97-98, 

 Sacramento, p. 68, 1 fig. 



1899. Kirk, T. W.— Fruit flies. <Xe\v Zealand Dept. Agr., Report 1899, pp. 

 232-234, figs. 7. 



1899. Kirk, T. W.— Fruit flies. <New Zealand Dept. Agr. Leaflet for Gar- 

 deners and Fruit Growers, no. 35, pp. 3, figs. 8. 



1899. LouNSBURY, C. r.— Report of the Govt. Ent. for 1899, <Dept. Agr. Cape 

 Good Hope, pp. 25-30. 

 Insect stated to be less prevalent some years than others. 



1899. Berlese, a. — l.a mosca della arance. <Boll. 29, Lab. Ent. Agr. Portici, 



pp. 1-7. 



1900. Le Ceratitis caijitata aux environs de Paris. <Rev. Encyclop. Larousse, 



ann. 10, p. 369. 

 1900. Herrera, a. L. — Classification y biologia del gusano. <Bol. de Agr. 

 Miueria e Industrias, No. 7-9, pp. 55-57. 

 Notes. 

 1900. Berlese, A. — Insetti uocivi agli alberi da frutto ed all a vite, Portici, p. 



62, fig. 22. 

 1900. Leonakdi. G.— Gli insetti nocivi (Napoli), p. 284, figs. 148-150. 



Biological notes and remedies. 

 1900. (iiARD, A. — Snr I'existence de Ccrniitls mititata aux environs de Paris. 

 <Comjit. Rend. Acad. Set., I'aiis, tome 131. pp. 4.36-438. 

 Notes on outbreak of insect at Courbevoie, near Paris. 



1900. BoRG, J. — Orange culture and diseases. <r'.iil. l'.<it. I>ept. .Jamaica, n. s. 7, 



no. 9, p. 136. 



1901. RiBAGA, C. — Insetti nocivi -all olivo ed agli agrunni. Portici, Stab, vesu- 



viano, p. 35. figs. 19-30. 

 1901. Froggatt, W. W. — Entomological work and notes for 1910. <Agr. Gaz. 

 N. S. Wales, vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 794-805 (Separate, ii. 12). 

 Note. 



1903. Craw, A. — Fruit flies and their exclusion. <Cal. Fruit Grower, vol. 28, 

 July 18, p. 4. 



1903. Buchanan, G. — Fruit fly. <Journ. Dept. Agr. W. Australia, February, 



pp. 109-110. 



1904. Mally, C. W.— The fruit fly. <Agr. Journ. Cape (iood Hope, vol. 25, 



no. 6. pp. 647-662. 1 pi.. 6 figs. 



Life history, food plants, food habits, parasites, remedies, etc. 



1904. Compere. G. — The introduction of the fruit fly parasite. <.Journ. Dept. 

 Agr. W. Australia, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 68-72. 



1904. Cartwright, W. — Notes on two insects. <Journ. Khediv. Agr. Soc. and 

 School Agr., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 17-19. 



1904. Mally, C. W., and Lounsbury, C. P. — Report of the Government entomol- 

 ogist for the half year ending June 30, 1904. <Cape Good Hope 

 Dept. Agr., Rept. Govt. Ent., 1904, p. 31. 



1904. Johnson, C. W. — ^A revised list of the Diptera of Bermuda. < Psyche, 



vol. 11, p. 79. 

 190.5. LotrNSBURY. C. P. — Natural enemies of the fruit fly. <Agr. Journ. Cape 

 Good Hope, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 84-87. 



1905. Hamel. a. — The biology of Ceratitis caintuta. <Bol. Agr. (Sao Paulo), 



6 ser., no. 8. pp. 352-354. 

 Biological notes. 



