20 BIBLIOGRAPHY OF COTTON BOLL. WEEVIL. 



No. 200. Marston, B. W., 1904. — Boll weevil diary. [Paris green applications, etc.] 



<Farm & Ranch, vol. 23, p. 17, April 30; p. 8, May 7; p. 17, May 14; p. 



13, May 21; p. 16, May 28; p. 16, June 18; p. 16, June 25; p. 13, July 9; 



p. 12, October 15; p. 17, October 29; p. 17, November 26. 

 No. 201. Marston, B. W., 1904. — Experience in poisoning the boll weevil. <Proc. 2nd 



Ann. Meet. La. Boll Weevil Conv., held at Shreveport, La. Cir. 2, La. 



Crop Pest Comm., pp. 65-83, 88-96. 

 A paper relating to the use of Paris green against the weevil by the writer; also letters 



from planters regarding its use; pages 88-96 contain discussions of Mr. Marston's paper. 



^o. 202. Marston, B. W., Frierson, L. S., and Newell, Wilmon, 1906.— Report of the 

 executive committee upon the Paris green experiments conducted 

 against the boll weevil during 1905.<CCir. 8, State Crop Pest Comm. La., 

 31 pp., 4 figs., May. 



No. 203. Mayer, August, 1904. — The boll-weevil situation from a Red River planter's 

 standpoint. <Proc. 2nd Ann. Meet. La. Boll Weevil Conv., held at Shreve- 

 port, La. Cir. 2, La. Crop Pest Comm., pp. 27-33. 



A discussion of the importance of maintaining soil fertility and of the interrelationship 

 existing between the boU weevil problem, thecattle-tick problem, and welfare of the farmer. 



No. 204. Mayer, August, 1907. — The most important factor in solving the boll weevil 

 problem. <Cir. 16, State Crop Pest Comm. La., 8 pp., June 20. 



Discussion of the relation of the cattle tick to the boll-weevil problem. Particular stress 

 Is placed upon the necessity of eradicating the cattle tick, so as to enable the cotton growers 

 of the South to raise cattle profitably, and thus have the manure to increase the produc- 

 tivity of the soil. 



No. 205. Morgan, A. C, 1907. — Papers on the cotton boll weevil and related and asso- 

 ciated insects. A predatory bug reported as an enemy of the cotton boll 

 weevil. <Bul. 63, pt. 4, Bur. Ent., U. S. Dept. Agr., pp. 49-54, figs. 8-9. 

 Life history and habits of a bug, Apiomerus spistipes Say, reported as an enemy of the boll 

 weevil. 



No. 206. Morgan, H. A., 1896. — The Mexican cotton bolIworm.<Rept. La. Bd. Agr. 

 for January, February, March, and April, pp. 2-6, 5 figs. 



A brief account of the boll weevil and its habits, with the principal remedies suggested 

 prior to this time by the Division of Entomology. 



No. 207. Morgan, H. A., 1903.— (See No. 296.) 



No. 208. Morgan, H. A., 1903. — To prevent the spread of the Mexican cotton boll 



weevil into the States. <Proc. 2nd Ann. Sess. Tex. Cotton Conv., pp. 



61-63. 

 A discussion of possible means of preventing the spread of the boll weevil. 



No. 209. Morgan, H. A., 1903. — How to protect Louisiana against the invasion of the 

 boll weevil. <Proc. Boll Weevil Conv. called by Gov. W. W. Heard, in 

 New Orleans. La. Bur. of Agr. and Immig., pp. 12-16. 



Suggests probable means of preventing or hindering the dissemination of the insect into 

 and throughout the State of Louisiana. 



No. 210- Morgan, H. A., 1904. — The Mexican boll weevil. <Farm & Ranch, vol. 23, 

 p. 17, May 14. 



An address (in part) made before a farmers' institute in Cass County, Tex. The 

 methods employed to stamp out isolated colonies of the weevil in Louisiana and probable 

 results of such work in Texas are given. 



No. 211. Morgan, H. A., 1904. — The Mexican cotton boll weevil. <Cir. 1, Crop Pest 

 Comm. La., 16 pp., 4 figs., June 1. 



A pamphlet of general information, including a brief history of the boll weevil and state- 

 ments from various sources regarding damages due to the pest. 



