PRACTICAL FISTT-CULTURE. 571 



B— ON THE SO-CALLED "DRY" METHOD OF IMPREGNATING 



SPAWN. 



From Circular No. 3, 1874, published by the German Deutsche Fischerei-Vertia, Berlin, 



Juno 22, 1874. 



[Translation.] 



FollowiDg a suggestion made iu Circular No. 1, 1874, 1 liave the honor 

 to lay before the public the results of a method of dry impregnation 

 practiced by me since 1857, which, if properly carried out, is sure to be 

 successful. 



As I have not read the articles on the subject contained in Circular 

 No. 4, 1871, and iu Circular No. G, 1873, I am not able to say whether 

 the "Russian dry method" recommended by Livingston Stone is simi- 

 lar to mine; the term "dry method," however, makes a similarity of 

 both methods very probable. 



In the autumn of 1854, I established at Wernersdorf, district of Bal- 

 keuhayn, province of Silesia, some trout-ponds, and it was my first care 

 to provide some cheap living food for the young trout i^laced in these 

 I)onds in the spring of 1855 and 185G. For this purpose, I had made, 

 close to one of the ponds, a spawning-basin with flat shores and sepa- 

 rated from the pond by a railing. In this basin, I placed some carp, 

 the young of which could through the railing escape into the pond. 



As there were older trout in the other ponds, I likewise endeavored 

 to raise young fish for these, and selected the " nase," which spawns 

 in large numbers in the river Bober in April, and is in those parts com- 

 monly called "znpe," {Chondrostona nasus, Sieb., Cyprinus nasus, Lin. 

 and Bloch.) These fish spawn in large numbers in the shallow stony 

 places in the middle of the bed of the river Bober, places over which 

 the water flowed rapidly and producing considerable waves. 



In April, 1856, 1 placed a large quantity of the roe of this fish — which 

 is easily extracted — in flat vessels tilled with Bober water, and after a 

 brief interval I poured in the ripe milt, stirring it with a quill-pen. This 

 method of impregnation differed in no respect from the one I had always 

 successfully employed with trout-spawn. The result of this artificial 

 impregnation, however, was an entire failure. 



The eggs, after having been placed in the water, swelled very rapidly 

 on account of the sticky layer surrounding them, so that no impregna- 

 tion could take place. 



Although I noticed this rapid swelling of the eggs, and their consider- 

 able stickiness, as after a short while they stuck so firmly to the bottom 

 of the vessel that it could be placed upside down without their falling 

 out, I did not find out the cause of this failure till I saw that there wa& 

 no normal development of the impregnated eggs, but that they were 

 entirely spoiled. 



I determined at my next attempt to pour the milt in immediately, and 



