THE WHALEBONE WHALES OF THE WESTERN NORTH ATLANTIC. 973 
described, and even in the same school or ‘gam.’ Moreover, we have experienced 
the greatest difficulty in finding any two of these strange animals externally alike, 
or possessing any marked generic or specific differences. If the differences pointed 
out as constituting different species are maintained, we conclude there must be a 
great number. We have observed, both in the dead and living animals, the follow- 
ing different external marks: Ist. Body black above, white beneath. 2d. Body 
black above and below, with more or less white mottling under the throat and above 
the abdomen ; pectoral and caudal fins white beneath, or slightly spotted with black. 
3d. Body black above, white beneath, with underside of pectoral and caudal fins of 
a dark ash-color. 4th. Body black above, with gray mottling beneath. In all of 
these varieties, both the caudal and pectoral fins differ in shape and size; the latter 
in some individuals being exceedingly long, narrow, and pointed, while others are 
comparatively short and broad, as shown in the outline (page 47), which also shows 
the parasites, commonly called barnacles, adhering to the throat, pectorals, and 
caudal fin. There are still others whose pectorals are of intermediate proportions, 
but terminate abruptly, as seen on page 48, which also represents the scalloped 
flukes present in some of the individuals. Again, in other examples, the caudal fin 
is narrow, pointed, and lunate; in others, still, it is broad, and nearly straight on 
the posterior edge. All these varieties feed and associate together on the same 
ground, and in every particular their habits are the same, so far as we have been 
able to ascertain from careful observation ; all, likewise, are infested by the same 
parasites. As to the dorsal protuberance called the hump, it is, as has been 
previously stated, of no regular shape or size, but is nearly of a uniform height; 
the posterior edge is sometimes tipped with white. As to the tubercles on the 
head and lips, they were present on all we have examined, twenty or more speci- 
mens ; those about the head are always well-developed, while those upon the lips, 
in many individuals, are scarcely perceptible. In some instances, however, they 
equal or exceed those which crown the skull. There is no regularity in the number 
of gular folds, which, as far as observed, vary in number from eighteen to twenty- 
six. In some cases they run parallel to each other; but usually there are several 
that either cross or terminate near the pectorals. The animals are all described as 
being black above; but in the examples which have been examined, there was not 
one when closely scrutinized, which did not reveal some light marks of white.” 
(82, 48, 44, foot-note.) 
It will be seen that the range of color variation is about the same in the 
Pacific Humpback, as in the Atlantic species. The pectorals are perhaps more fre- 
quently black externally, but as they are also pure white at times, as shown by 
the photographs above-mentioned, this can hardly be looked upon as indicating 
a specific difference. (See pl. 41, figs. 1, 2.) 
The number of abdominal ridges is not different from that found in JZ. 
nodosa. 
One peculiarity merits attention. Scammon states that some parts of the body 
in the Pacifie Humpback are occasionally gray. The Newfoundland Humpbacks 
which I examined were all black and white, without gradation or intermingling so 
as to produce shades of gray, but Rawitz (74) has stated that one of the Humpbacks 
examined by him at Bear Id., Norway, was gray on the throat. 
Scammon gives measurements of the three specimens above mentioned, which, 
together with a part of the earlier ones, are as follows : 
