286 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL, 92 
? 
The genotypes of the following genera have been described subse- 
quent to their original publication, identified by synonymy with 
other species, or have not been found: 
Genus CHROMCCRYPTUS Ashmead 
Chromocryptus ASHMEAD, Proc. U. 8. Nat. Mus., vol. 23, p. 41, 1900. (Genotype, 
CO. albopictus Ashmead.) 
I have already® published a description and the synonymy of 
this genus and of its genotype ® and synonymized the genotype with 
Chromocryptus planosae (Fitch). 
Genus NEOPIMPLA Ashmead 
Neopimpla ASHMEAD, Proc. U. 8S. Nat. Mus., vol. 23, p. 56, 1900. (Genotype, 
N. abbottii Ashmead. ) 
I have been unable to find the type or any other specimen of 
this species. 
Genus LEPTOBATOPSIS Ashmead 
Leptobatopsis ASHMEAD, Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., vol. 23, p. 47, 1900. (Genotype, 
L. australiensis Ashmead. ) 
I have already discussed this genus’ and later * synonymized the 
genotype with Leptobatopsis indicus (Cameron) and have given the 
synonymy of the genus. 
Genus EUCTENOPUS Ashmead 
Euctenopus ASHMEAD, Proce. U. S. Nat. Mus., vol. 23, p. 50, 1900. (Genotype, 
[H. zealandicus Ashmead]=#. novazealandicus Ashmead.) 
It should be noted that the first publication of this genus was in 
the Proceedings of the Linnaean Society of New South Wales, which 
is dated June 27, 1900, whereas the Classification of the Ichneumon 
Flies did not appear until October 13, 1900. Also, the genotype was 
originally described as EF’. novazealandicus. The genus is very closely 
allied to Phytodietus, from which it differs, in addition to the vena- 
tional characters given by Ashmead, in its lack of the prepectoral 
carina and its more distinctly defined notaulices. The malar space 
is not effaced, as stated by Ashmead, but is fully a third as long as 
the basal width of the mandible. 
5 Proce. U. S. Nat. Mus., vol. 58, p. 254, 1920. 
6 Jour. Washington Acad. Sci., vol. 15, p. 389, 1925. 
7 Philippine Journ. Sci., vol. 20, p. 591, 1922. 
8 Ins. Matsumurana, vol. 8, p. 17, 1938. 
