﻿326 
  rUOCKEDINGS 
  OF 
  THU 
  MALACOLOGICAL 
  SOCIEIT. 
  

  

  recent 
  genus 
  Terehralicx 
  without 
  causing; 
  serious 
  confusion. 
  I 
  tliere- 
  

   fore 
  ]iropose 
  the 
  new 
  generic 
  name 
  CAMrANii-OPA 
  for 
  the 
  species 
  

   Cerifhium 
  giganteum, 
  Lamarck 
  (Ann. 
  Mus, 
  Hist. 
  Nat. 
  Paris, 
  vol. 
  iii, 
  

   March, 
  1804, 
  p. 
  439). 
  It 
  does 
  not 
  seem 
  necessary 
  to 
  discuss 
  tlie 
  

   rehitionsliips 
  ot" 
  this 
  species 
  since 
  Cossmann 
  has 
  dealt 
  so 
  ahly 
  with 
  

   tlicse 
  in 
  his 
  nieniorahle 
  " 
  Essais". 
  

  

  With 
  regard 
  to 
  the 
  specific 
  name 
  of 
  the 
  sole 
  species 
  of 
  Campanile, 
  

   I 
  again 
  find 
  confusion. 
  In 
  1834 
  Quoy 
  & 
  Gaimard 
  introduced 
  

   a 
  Cerithixwi 
  leve 
  (Voy. 
  Astrol. 
  Zool., 
  a'oI. 
  iii, 
  pt. 
  i, 
  p. 
  106, 
  pi. 
  liv, 
  

   tigs. 
  1-3, 
  West 
  Australia), 
  and 
  at 
  the 
  same 
  time 
  Griffith 
  & 
  Pidgeou 
  

   figured 
  the 
  shell 
  under 
  the 
  name 
  Cerithinm 
  truncatum. 
  This 
  was 
  due 
  

   to 
  a 
  careless 
  slip 
  which 
  was 
  corrected 
  iu 
  the 
  Index 
  to 
  C. 
  Icere, 
  Gray. 
  

   Thus 
  it 
  would 
  seem 
  a 
  question 
  which 
  name 
  has 
  priority, 
  but 
  there 
  is 
  

   on 
  record 
  an 
  earlier 
  use 
  of 
  the 
  same 
  name. 
  Mathews 
  and 
  myself 
  in 
  the 
  

   Victorian 
  Naturalisf, 
  vol. 
  xxix, 
  1912, 
  p. 
  11, 
  noted 
  the 
  introduction 
  

   of 
  Cerithinm 
  Levis 
  by 
  Perry 
  in 
  the 
  Arcana, 
  pt. 
  xv, 
  1810. 
  I 
  have 
  

   been 
  unable 
  to 
  discover 
  anj* 
  synonym 
  of 
  tlie 
  West 
  Australian 
  sliell, 
  

   and 
  therefore 
  propose 
  for 
  it 
  the 
  name 
  Campanile 
  symbolicum. 
  Since 
  

   Gray 
  apparently 
  proposed 
  his 
  name 
  simultaneously 
  with 
  tliat 
  of 
  

   Quoy 
  & 
  Gaimard 
  I 
  select 
  as 
  tlie 
  shell 
  recjuiriug 
  the 
  new 
  name 
  tliat 
  

   specimen 
  in 
  the 
  liritish 
  ^luseum 
  wliich 
  was 
  figured 
  in 
  Griffith 
  «& 
  

   Pidgeou, 
  Animal 
  Kingdom 
  (Cuvier), 
  vol. 
  xii, 
  Moll., 
  pi. 
  xiii, 
  fig. 
  1, 
  

   with 
  the 
  name 
  on 
  plate 
  Cerithinm 
  truncatum. 
  In 
  the 
  Index, 
  p. 
  596, 
  

   1834, 
  is 
  Avritten 
  pi. 
  xiii, 
  fig. 
  1, 
  Cerithinm 
  Iceve, 
  Gray, 
  with 
  a 
  note 
  

   "Erratum 
  in 
  the 
  plate, 
  Del. 
  trancatnm, 
  lege 
  lave^\ 
  while 
  lower 
  

   down 
  is 
  " 
  pi. 
  xiv, 
  fig. 
  4, 
  Cerithinm 
  truncatutn, 
  Lam," 
  While 
  Verco 
  

   used 
  Campa7iile 
  generally 
  for 
  this 
  shell 
  Hedley 
  has 
  more 
  recently 
  

   adopted 
  CeratoptHus, 
  Bouvier 
  (Bull. 
  Soc. 
  Philora. 
  Paris, 
  ser. 
  vii, 
  

   vol. 
  xi, 
  p. 
  36, 
  1887), 
  but 
  the 
  latter 
  is 
  later 
  in 
  date 
  and 
  must 
  fall 
  as 
  

   an 
  absolute 
  synonym 
  of 
  Campanile. 
  

  

  Plkurotomoidks, 
  Bronn, 
  vice 
  Loka, 
  Gistel. 
  

  

  In 
  1912 
  I 
  noted 
  in 
  these 
  Proceedings 
  (vol. 
  x, 
  p. 
  225) 
  that 
  Lora, 
  

   Gistel, 
  was 
  proposed 
  in 
  1848 
  for 
  Befrancia, 
  Millet, 
  preoccupied, 
  and 
  

   should 
  therefore 
  supersede 
  Clathurella, 
  Carpenter, 
  introduced 
  for 
  the 
  

   same 
  reason. 
  As 
  Gistel 
  named 
  in 
  connexion 
  with 
  his 
  proposal 
  

   a 
  species 
  not 
  referable 
  to 
  Millet's 
  group 
  a 
  complication 
  might 
  have 
  

   ensued. 
  It 
  is 
  obviated 
  in 
  one 
  direction 
  by 
  the 
  discovery 
  that 
  prior 
  

   to 
  Gistel 
  even, 
  a 
  name 
  had 
  been 
  pioposed 
  for 
  Defrancia 
  of 
  Millet, 
  

   for 
  Bronn 
  in 
  the 
  Ital. 
  Tertiar. 
  Gebilde, 
  1831, 
  divided 
  the 
  geniis 
  

   Pleurotoma 
  into 
  two 
  sub-genera, 
  Pleurotoma, 
  s.str., 
  and 
  Flenrotomoides 
  

   for 
  "■Defrancia, 
  Millet, 
  non 
  Brn." 
  This 
  av:is 
  confirmed 
  by 
  Bronn 
  

   in 
  the 
  Lethma 
  Geognostica, 
  vol. 
  ii, 
  1838, 
  pp. 
  1062, 
  1064, 
  where 
  

   he 
  used 
  Pleurotomoides 
  {Defrancia). 
  "Wliile 
  this 
  item 
  disposes 
  of 
  

   Defrancia, 
  Millet, 
  and 
  its 
  substitutes, 
  it 
  interests 
  palseontologists 
  

   more 
  than 
  recent 
  moUuscan 
  students, 
  since 
  I 
  see 
  no 
  relationship 
  

   between 
  the 
  fossils 
  grouped 
  by 
  Millet 
  and 
  the 
  recent 
  small 
  species 
  

   classed 
  under 
  Clathurella. 
  Melvill 
  lias 
  proposed 
  Clathurina 
  (antea, 
  

   p. 
  185) 
  for 
  a 
  certain 
  recent 
  group, 
  so 
  that 
  we 
  have 
  one 
  name, 
  but 
  

   Boettger 
  had 
  previously 
  introduced 
  Paraclathurella, 
  etc. 
  Hedley 
  is 
  

  

  