﻿40 
  PROCEEDINGS 
  OF 
  THE 
  MALACOLOGICAL 
  SOCIETr. 
  

  

  of 
  fact 
  I 
  note 
  many 
  group 
  names 
  missing 
  which 
  might 
  have 
  

   significance 
  in 
  connexion 
  with 
  the 
  new 
  groups 
  introduced 
  hy 
  

   Bartsch. 
  He 
  greatly 
  confuses 
  Suheulima 
  and 
  Scalenostoma, 
  as 
  may 
  

   be 
  seen 
  from 
  the 
  fact 
  that 
  he 
  has 
  described 
  a 
  Suheulima 
  magnifica, 
  

   a 
  shell 
  5 
  mm. 
  long, 
  whereas 
  the 
  type 
  was 
  23 
  mm. 
  long 
  and 
  not 
  

   congeneric. 
  

  

  I 
  hope 
  to 
  deal 
  thoroughly 
  with 
  this 
  group 
  later 
  on, 
  for 
  I 
  possess 
  

   species 
  belonging 
  to 
  such 
  rare 
  sections 
  as 
  Selma, 
  A. 
  Adams, 
  Apicalia, 
  

   A. 
  Adams, 
  and 
  Hoplopteron, 
  Fischer, 
  the 
  last 
  named 
  appearing 
  to 
  be 
  

   misunderstood 
  by 
  both 
  Dall 
  and 
  Bartsch. 
  In 
  the 
  meanwhile 
  I 
  

   propose 
  Teretianax 
  for 
  the 
  shell 
  from 
  the 
  Kermadecs 
  described 
  by 
  

   Oliver 
  under 
  the 
  name 
  Scalenostoma 
  stiteri, 
  a 
  doubtful 
  member 
  of 
  

   tliis 
  family 
  (?). 
  

  

  