344 RErOKT OF THE COMMISSIONER OF FISH AND FISHERIES. 



1888 f — Duvar, J. H. (Secretary). Report of the Commissioners Appointed to Report 

 on the Eohster and Oyster Fisheries of Canada. Ottawa, 1888, 65 pp. 



1888 g — Fryer, Charles E. Report to the Board of Trade by Mr. C. E. Fryor, In- 

 8]ie(lor of Fisheries, on the Injury Alleged to be Caused to tiio Fisheries 

 by the Deposit of Rubbisli in the Estuary of the River Thames. London, 

 1888. 4^, 11 pp. 



Cites the diiniago done to the oyster beds at the mouth of the Thames by the deposit of 

 rubbish and rccoiinucuds certain regulations for preventing it. 



1888 h — Morgan, C. Lloyd. Oysters. ^Murray's Magazine, London, January, 1888, 

 vol. Ill, pp. 87-91. 



'•All that I propose to do here is to say a few words, suitable for those who do not like 

 lobe altogether ignorant of such matters, but have neither the time nor the inclination to 

 be fully instructed, on the life-history of the oyster from its birth to its descent into the 

 eager and expectant tomb." See 1888 i. 



18881 — Morgan, C. Lloyd. Oysters. <Littell'8 Living Age, Boston, January, 1888, 



vol. 176, pp. 164-168. 

 A reprint of 1888 A. 

 1888 j — Oeniler, A. Needs of the Georgia oyster industry. <[The News, Savannah, 



Ga., November 20, 1888. 

 1888k— Pike, R. G.; Hudson, W. M., and Bill, J. A. Eighth Report of the Shellfish 



Commissioners of the State of Connecticut, for the year ending October 



31, 1888. Middletown, 1888. 8°, 27 pp. 



Contains an account of the procedures of the Commissioners and the gcner.al condition 

 of the oyster industry of the State in 1888. The area of ground held by individuals for 

 planting purposes on October 31, 1888, was 78,11)7.56 acres. 



18881 — Segrave, E. S. Report on the Oyster Fisheries of Maryland. Foreign 

 Office, Misc. series, No. 8, Reports on subjects of general and commercial 

 importance. United States. London, 1888. 8°, 7 pp. 



A compilation of data previously published relative to the extent of the oyster indus- 

 try of ilaryland, with notes on the shipment of the so-called "locked-oyslers." 



1888 m — Winkley, Henry "W. Molluscs ibund in the oyster beds of Cognac, N. B. 

 Bedeque and Suiiinierside, P. E. I. <^Bunetin of the Natural History So- 

 ciety of New Brunswick. No. vii, pp. 69-71. Saint John, N. B., Barnes 

 & Co., 1888. 



1888 n — Anonymous. Oyster-culture at Arcachon. <^Blackwood's Magazine, Lon- 

 don, March, 1888, vol. 143, pp. 366-371. 



1888 o — Anonymous. Our oyster navy. <^The Sun, Baltimore, November 20, 1888 

 A description of the Maryland oyster police force and its efHciency. 



1888 p — Anonymous. The oyster war. <:^The Telegraph, Philadelphia, December 

 12, 1888. 

 An account of the troubles in the Chesapeake li-.iy in 1888. 



1888 q — Anonymous. Oyster Laws Enacted by the General Assembly of Mary- 

 land at the January sessions, 1881, 1886, and 1888. Annapolis, 1888. 8°, 

 30 pp. 



1888 r — Anonymous. Article lxxii. Oysters. Annapolis, 1888. 8^, 36 pp. 



A compilation of all the general oyster laws of Maryland operative in 1888. 



1889 a — Cowen, John K. The Maryland oyster in State jjolitics. <^TheSun, Balti- 



more, February 4, 1889. 



A compreliousive discussion of the political reasons for the lack of encouragement to 

 oyster-culturists in the State of Maryland. 



1889 b— Delmonico, Charles. The Blue I'oint fraud. <;The Evening Star, Wash- 

 ington, October 26, 1889. 

 A gnstronomical discussion. 



