290 TRANSACTIONS AND PllOGEKDINGS OF THE [Skss. LXVii. 



Fragaria elatior, Ehrh.— Recorded as an escape in S2. 83, 85. Other 

 cultivated forms may also be among those occasionally found on 

 waste ground and by roads. 



Potentilla norvegica, L. — 86, casual. 



recta, L. — 82 and 85, casual. 



verna, L.— 81, 82, 83, 85 (S.). 



silvestris, Neck. (F. Tonnentilla, Scop.). — In all. 



procumbens, Sibth. — IS'otfroin 78, 79, 82, 84- 



rep tans, L. — Not from 8 J/. 



Auserina, L. — In all. 



rupestris, L. — 83 (?). 



argentea, L. — Not from 78, 79, 86. 



fruticosa, L.— f in 83, 85, 87 (S.). 



palustris, Scop. — Not from 78. 



Sibbaldi, Hall, f.— 78," 86, 87, on high hills. 



Alchemilla arvensis, L. — In all. 



vulgaris, L. — From all the counties, but the varieties recorded 



only from — pratensis, Schmidt, 83, 86 ; alpestris. >^chmidt, 86 ; 

 filicaulis, Buser, 86. 



alpina, L. — 86, 87, on hills. 



( argentea, Lam.— Probably may be found as an outcast or escape.) 



Agrimonia Eupatoria, L, — Not from 84. 



odorata, Miller. — 86. 



(Aremonia agrimonioides, DC. — Occurs as an escape or outcast iu various 



parts of Scotland, and probably here also.) 

 Poterium Sanguisorba, L.— 80, 81. 82 f. 85 f. 



officinale, Hook, f.— 79, 80, 81. 



Rosa. — In this genus, as among the Brambles, there is much need of a 

 careful and thorough revision of the records and herbaria, in 

 light of the conclusions arrived at in recent years. Mr. W. 

 Barclay has lately done much by papers and personal field work 

 to remove the difficulties that beset the study of the Roses of 

 Scotland. It appears scarcely worth while to enumerate the 

 older determinations of the varieties under R. cauina and others, 

 both species and varieties being accepted now in widely different 

 significance in a good many cases. 



pimpinellifolia, L. f., spino-sissima, L. — In all. 



involnta, L. — (Now regarded as made up of hybrids) 79, 81, 82, 



83, 84. Var. Sabini, Woods. 81, 82, 83, 84. 



mollis, Sm. — Not from 82, 84- 



— — tomentosa, Sm. — In all. 



■ rubiginosa, L. — Not from 78. 79, 80. Generally regarded as a 



doubtful native in Scotland, though often its habitats look much 

 like those of a truly native species. 



canina, L., R. glauca, Vill., and R. coriifolia, Fr., have not been 



distinguished in the past in this part of Scotland, hence the 

 records are not trustworthy. 



arvensis, Huds. — f (?) in 82, S3, 86. 



sempervirens, L., and R. alpina, L., have been recorded from 84, 



but had been planted, or were escaped. 

 Pyrus Aria, L. — 81, 83, 85, 86, probably f, though not always marked 



so. No doubt in the other counties also. 

 intermedia, Ehrh. — t in 85, 87. 



Aucuparia, Ehrh. — Not from SJf- 



communis, L. — 83, 84, no doubt +. 



Malus, L.— 78, 80, 81 (?) t, 83, 84, 86 t, 87. Probably t in some 



at least of these, and requiring revision, the forms under the 

 species not being distinguished. 



