﻿58 
  On 
  the 
  ApidpG 
  in 
  the 
  British 
  Museum. 
  

  

  Anthophora 
  hirnalayensis, 
  Rad., 
  var. 
  pahangensis, 
  var. 
  nov. 
  

  

  5 
  . 
  A. 
  liimalayensi 
  typico 
  similis, 
  sed 
  terg. 
  1-3 
  fasciis 
  apicalibus 
  

   rufescente-piloais. 
  

  

  ? 
  . 
  Similar 
  to 
  tlie 
  typical 
  form, 
  but 
  tergites 
  1-3 
  with 
  

   apical 
  t'ascia3 
  of 
  rufous 
  pubescence, 
  that 
  on 
  terg-ite 
  3 
  widely 
  

   broken 
  medially. 
  

  

  Pahang: 
  Gunong 
  Tahau 
  (2500-3500 
  ft.), 
  v.-vii. 
  1D05 
  

   {Herbert 
  G. 
  Robinson), 
  1 
  $ 
  (fype) 
  ; 
  there 
  is 
  also 
  a 
  female 
  

   Irom 
  Mt. 
  Opliir, 
  Johore, 
  I2tli 
  Aug. 
  1905 
  {Dr. 
  R. 
  IJanitsch), 
  

   iu 
  bad 
  condition, 
  but 
  probably 
  belonging 
  to 
  this 
  variety. 
  

  

  Anthophora 
  cingulata, 
  F. 
  

  

  MegiUa 
  cingulata, 
  F., 
  Syst. 
  Piez. 
  p. 
  332. 
  no. 
  IS 
  (1804). 
  

  

  Anthophora 
  ciJict.a, 
  IJours 
  (nee 
  Fabr.), 
  Mon. 
  Icon. 
  Anthophora, 
  p. 
  58 
  

  

  (1869). 
  2. 
  _ 
  

  

  Anthophora 
  e^netidata, 
  Smith, 
  New 
  Spec. 
  Hymen. 
  Brit. 
  Mus. 
  p. 
  123 
  

  

  (1879). 
  S 
  Oiec 
  $ 
  )• 
  _^ 
  . 
  

   Anthophora 
  cmendata, 
  Smitli, 
  var. 
  yilberti, 
  Ckll 
  Ann. 
  & 
  Mag. 
  Nat. 
  

  

  Hist. 
  (7) 
  XTi. 
  p. 
  390 
  (1905). 
  $ 
  . 
  

  

  The 
  type 
  of 
  this 
  species 
  is 
  in 
  the 
  Banks 
  Collection 
  in 
  the 
  

   British 
  JMuseum. 
  iSniirh 
  incoirectly 
  gives 
  his 
  type 
  of 
  

   A. 
  emendata 
  as 
  a 
  $ 
  , 
  which 
  accounts 
  for 
  Cockerell's 
  descrip- 
  

   tion 
  of 
  a 
  new 
  variety. 
  The 
  ty})e 
  of 
  A. 
  emendata 
  is 
  a 
  (J, 
  and 
  

   the 
  var. 
  gilberti, 
  Ckll., 
  is 
  certainly 
  the 
  female 
  of 
  the 
  same 
  

   species. 
  

  

  The 
  two 
  specimens 
  from 
  Clare, 
  South 
  Australia 
  (Ann. 
  & 
  

   Mag. 
  Nat. 
  Hist. 
  (7) 
  xvi. 
  p. 
  3U7, 
  1905), 
  are 
  erroneously 
  

   recorded 
  as 
  this 
  species. 
  

  

  JllmpJioropsis 
  carinifrons, 
  Cam. 
  

  

  This 
  species, 
  from 
  Hacienda 
  Guachaln, 
  Ecuador 
  {^Ed. 
  

   Whymjyer) 
  , 
  was 
  described 
  as 
  Hahropoda. 
  Cockerell 
  has 
  

   already 
  (Canad. 
  Ent. 
  xxxvi. 
  p. 
  302) 
  transferred 
  Smith's 
  

   Mexican 
  species 
  (also 
  described 
  as 
  Habropoda?) 
  to 
  Emplio- 
  

   ropsis. 
  E. 
  bombij'ormis, 
  Sm. 
  (1879), 
  is 
  omitted 
  from 
  Halla 
  

   Torre's 
  catalogues. 
  

  

  