﻿5.'') 
  8 
  Mr. 
  R. 
  W. 
  ITooley 
  on 
  the 
  

  

  (PI. 
  XXII. 
  fig. 
  4), 
  and 
  therefore 
  iu 
  future 
  should 
  be 
  known 
  

   as 
  a 
  synonym 
  of 
  Criorhi/nc/ms 
  shims, 
  and 
  naturally 
  falling 
  

   into 
  Group 
  no. 
  4 
  as 
  above. 
  

  

  Ornithocheirus 
  duviesii 
  (Owen). 
  

   Rep. 
  Meso. 
  Form. 
  (Pal. 
  Soc. 
  1874) 
  pt. 
  i. 
  p. 
  2, 
  pi. 
  i. 
  figs. 
  5 
  & 
  6. 
  

  

  The 
  form 
  and 
  size 
  of 
  tlie 
  teetli 
  and 
  the 
  lanceolate 
  shape 
  of 
  

   this 
  dentary 
  bone 
  prove 
  it 
  to 
  belong 
  to 
  Group 
  no, 
  2. 
  

  

  Ormtliocheirus 
  gigantcus 
  (Bowerbank). 
  

   Quart. 
  Journ. 
  Geol. 
  Soc. 
  vol. 
  ii. 
  (1840) 
  p. 
  8, 
  pi. 
  i., 
  and 
  elsewhere. 
  

  

  The 
  tip 
  of 
  the 
  muzzle 
  of 
  both 
  the 
  upper 
  and 
  lower 
  jaw. 
  

  

  We 
  are 
  convinced 
  that 
  its 
  conical 
  shape 
  has 
  been 
  produced 
  

   by 
  vertical 
  expansion 
  due 
  to 
  pressure, 
  and 
  possibly 
  its 
  widtii 
  

   proceeds 
  from 
  the 
  same 
  cause. 
  Taking 
  this 
  into 
  considera- 
  

   tion, 
  and 
  also 
  the 
  type 
  of 
  the 
  teeth, 
  which 
  are 
  strongly 
  

   characteristic, 
  this 
  species 
  can 
  be 
  included 
  within 
  Group 
  

   no. 
  2. 
  

  

  Ornithocheirus 
  reedi 
  (Seeley) 
  . 
  

   Geol. 
  Mag. 
  [2] 
  vol. 
  viii. 
  (1881) 
  p. 
  13, 
  pi. 
  i. 
  tig. 
  3. 
  

  

  Seeley 
  * 
  says 
  this 
  species 
  " 
  closely 
  rtsenibles 
  Ornitho- 
  

   cheirus 
  cupito 
  '' 
  ; 
  therefore 
  it 
  comes 
  into 
  Group 
  no. 
  4. 
  

  

  Ornithocheirus 
  sugittirostris 
  (Owen). 
  

   Rep. 
  Meso. 
  Form. 
  (Mou, 
  Pal. 
  Soc. 
  1874) 
  pt. 
  i. 
  p. 
  3, 
  pi. 
  ii. 
  

  

  These 
  mandibular 
  rami 
  from 
  the 
  Wealden, 
  by 
  the 
  angle 
  

   of 
  their 
  convergence 
  towards 
  the 
  symphysis, 
  and 
  the 
  form, 
  

   size, 
  and 
  arrangement 
  of 
  the 
  teeth 
  belong 
  to 
  Group 
  no. 
  2. 
  

  

  Ornithocheirus 
  xyphorhynclnis 
  (Seeley). 
  

  

  'Oniithosauria,' 
  p, 
  117 
  : 
  and 
  Geol, 
  Mag. 
  [2] 
  vol, 
  viii. 
  (1881) 
  p. 
  18, 
  pi. 
  i. 
  

   fig. 
  2. 
  

  

  In 
  the 
  former 
  paper 
  Seeley 
  determined 
  this 
  fragment 
  to 
  

   be 
  a 
  part 
  of 
  a 
  premaxillary, 
  in 
  the 
  latter 
  of 
  a 
  dentary. 
  It 
  is 
  

   very 
  close 
  to 
  Ornithocheirus 
  sedgwicki, 
  and 
  should 
  therefore 
  

   be 
  included 
  in 
  Group 
  no. 
  1. 
  

  

  * 
  H, 
  G. 
  Seelev, 
  ' 
  Oriiithosauria; 
  1870, 
  p. 
  127, 
  

  

  