﻿NO. 
  1124. 
  REVISIOX 
  OF 
  THE 
  MELAXOPLI—SCUDBEIi. 
  405 
  

  

  1877. 
  Aptenopedes 
  rufovittata 
  Scudfler^ 
  Aplenopedes 
  rufovittata. 
  

  

  1878. 
  Pezotettix 
  rusticus 
  Stal=rMelauo])lu.s 
  riisticus. 
  

  

  1877. 
  Caloptonas 
  sangninocephahis 
  La 
  Muiiyon 
  = 
  Phoetaliote.s 
  iiebrasceiisis. 
  

  

  1877. 
  Caloptenus 
  aanguinolentus 
  Provauclier 
  = 
  Melano])luM 
  fciunr 
  rubrmii. 
  

  

  1870. 
  Caloptenus 
  scriptus 
  Walker. 
  Determinable 
  only 
  by 
  coiuparisou 
  with 
  types 
  in 
  the 
  British 
  

  

  MiLseiim. 
  

   1864. 
  Pezotettix 
  scudderi 
  irhler=^ 
  Melanoplus 
  scudderi. 
  

  

  1870. 
  Caloptenus 
  selectus 
  "Walker. 
  Determinable 
  only 
  by 
  study 
  of 
  types 
  in 
  tbe 
  British 
  Museum. 
  

   18G1. 
  Pezotettix 
  septentrionalis 
  Sau8.sure 
  = 
  Melanoplus 
  borealis. 
  

   1872. 
  Pezotettix 
  speciosa 
  Scudder=Hesperotettix 
  speciosus. 
  

  

  1877. 
  Aptenopedes 
  sx>heuarioides 
  Scudder;= 
  Aptenopedes 
  sidienarioides. 
  

   18(i5. 
  Aeridinm 
  spretis 
  Ubler 
  MS. 
  Thomas 
  = 
  Melanoplus 
  spretus. 
  

  

  1876. 
  Pezotettix 
  stupefactvis 
  Scudder= 
  Podisma 
  stupefacta. 
  

   186!. 
  Pezotettix 
  sumichrasti 
  Saussure= 
  ? 
  Melanoplus 
  bivittatus. 
  

   1876. 
  Pezotettix 
  tellustris 
  Scudder:=: 
  Melanoplus 
  dawsoni. 
  

  

  1879. 
  Melanoplus 
  tenebrosus 
  Scudder^ 
  Melanoplus 
  keeleri. 
  

   1879. 
  Pezotettix 
  texanus 
  Scudder 
  = 
  Melanoplus 
  texanus. 
  

  

  1872. 
  Caloptenus 
  turnbulli 
  Thomas 
  = 
  Aeoloplus 
  turnbuUi. 
  

  

  1873. 
  Pezotettix 
  unicolor 
  Thomas 
  = 
  Melanoplus 
  scudderi. 
  

  

  1878. 
  Pezotettix 
  varieolor 
  Stal 
  = 
  Paradichroplns 
  varicolor. 
  

   [1879. 
  Pezotettix 
  variegatus 
  Scudder 
  = 
  Dactylotum 
  variegatum.] 
  

  

  1879. 
  Melanoplus 
  variolosus 
  Scudder 
  = 
  Melanoplus 
  occidentalis. 
  

   1876. 
  Pezotettix 
  viola 
  Thomas 
  := 
  Melanoplus 
  viola. 
  

  

  18C1. 
  Pedies 
  virescens 
  Saussure. 
  Undetermined; 
  perhaps 
  not 
  belonging 
  to 
  this 
  group. 
  

   1872. 
  Caloptenus 
  viridis 
  Thomas 
  = 
  Hes])erotettix 
  viridis. 
  

  

  1876. 
  Pezotettix 
  vivax 
  Scudder 
  = 
  Campylacantha 
  vivax. 
  

  

  1877. 
  Caloptenus 
  volucris 
  Dodge 
  = 
  Phoelaliotes 
  nebrascenais. 
  

  

  188"i. 
  Pezotettix 
  washingtonianus 
  Bruner 
  = 
  Melanoplus 
  washingtonianus. 
  

  

  1875. 
  Caloptenus 
  yarrowii 
  Thomas 
  ^Melanoplus 
  yarrowii. 
  

  

  1861. 
  Pezotettix 
  zimmermanni 
  Saussure— 
  .'Melanoplus 
  uigrescens. 
  

  

  2. 
  UNDETERMIXKD 
  FOR.MS. 
  

  

  1. 
  Poepedetes 
  corallinus 
  Saussure, 
  Rev. 
  Mag. 
  Zool., 
  1861, 
  p. 
  158. 
  Mexico 
  temperata. 
  It 
  is 
  doubtful 
  

   if 
  this 
  Mexican 
  species, 
  unknown 
  to 
  me, 
  belongs 
  in 
  the 
  MeJanopli; 
  it 
  seems 
  to 
  be 
  more 
  nearly 
  allied 
  

   to 
  Dactylotum. 
  

  

  2. 
  Pezotettix 
  fauriei 
  Bolivar, 
  Anal. 
  Soc. 
  Esp. 
  Hist. 
  Nat., 
  XIX 
  (1890), 
  pp. 
  322-323. 
  This 
  species 
  from 
  

   Yesso, 
  Japan, 
  seems 
  to 
  be 
  a 
  Podisma, 
  but 
  it 
  is 
  described 
  from 
  the 
  female 
  alone, 
  so 
  that 
  I 
  can 
  not 
  

   place 
  it 
  more 
  closely. 
  

  

  3. 
  Caleoptenus 
  (nc\) 
  jlavoUneatus 
  Thomas, 
  Bull. 
  U. 
  S. 
  Geol. 
  Surv. 
  Terr., 
  I, 
  Istseries, 
  No. 
  2 
  (1874), 
  p. 
  68. 
  

   I 
  am 
  unable 
  to 
  determine 
  this 
  southern 
  California 
  species, 
  and 
  am 
  tolerably 
  confident 
  I 
  have 
  not 
  seen 
  

   it 
  : 
  for 
  in 
  this 
  case 
  there 
  is 
  apparently 
  sufficient 
  in 
  tbe 
  description 
  to 
  fix 
  the 
  species 
  when 
  specimens 
  

   are 
  obtained. 
  It 
  has 
  been 
  thought 
  by 
  some 
  to 
  be 
  Ocdaleonotus 
  enigma 
  collaris, 
  but 
  that 
  is 
  scarcely 
  

   possible. 
  

  

  4. 
  Pezotettix 
  mezicana 
  Saussure, 
  Rev. 
  ^lag. 
  Zool., 
  1861, 
  p. 
  160. 
  Mexico 
  temperata. 
  From 
  the 
  descrip- 
  

   tion 
  it 
  is 
  iiiii)ossible 
  to 
  determine 
  which 
  of 
  the 
  many 
  Mexican 
  species 
  this 
  may 
  be, 
  but 
  I 
  suspect 
  it 
  

   may 
  prove 
  to 
  be 
  Melanojilus 
  atlanis. 
  

  

  5. 
  Pezotettix 
  mikado 
  Bolivar, 
  Ann. 
  Soc. 
  Esp. 
  Hist. 
  Nat., 
  XIX 
  (1890), 
  p. 
  323. 
  Yesso, 
  Japan. 
  Like 
  the 
  

   other 
  species 
  of 
  Bolivar, 
  No. 
  2, 
  this 
  is 
  described 
  from 
  the 
  female 
  only, 
  and 
  I 
  can 
  not 
  place 
  it. 
  It 
  is 
  pre- 
  

   sumably- 
  a 
  Podisma. 
  

  

  6. 
  Caloptenus 
  repletus 
  Walker, 
  Cat. 
  Derm. 
  Salt. 
  Brit. 
  Mus., 
  IV 
  (1870). 
  pp. 
  678-679. 
  I 
  had 
  thought 
  this 
  

   species 
  to 
  be 
  probably 
  Melanoplus 
  hilituralus, 
  but 
  there 
  was 
  little 
  in 
  Walker's 
  description 
  whereon 
  to 
  

   b.nse 
  an 
  opinion. 
  Mr. 
  Samuel 
  Henshaw, 
  however, 
  kindly 
  compared 
  hilituratus 
  with 
  the 
  specimens 
  

   placed 
  under 
  v«p?eJ»s 
  in 
  the 
  British 
  Museum 
  and 
  found 
  them 
  distinct. 
  Walker 
  credited 
  it 
  to 
  " 
  U. 
  

   States" 
  and 
  " 
  Vancouver's 
  Island," 
  one 
  specimen 
  each, 
  but 
  Mr. 
  Henshaw 
  found 
  no 
  specimens 
  from 
  

   Vancouver, 
  but 
  two 
  males 
  and 
  a 
  female 
  from 
  " 
  North 
  America," 
  one 
  specimen 
  being 
  further 
  labeled 
  

   ''Illinois." 
  The 
  two 
  males 
  were 
  ditferent 
  species, 
  one 
  being 
  Melanoplus 
  femoratvs, 
  the 
  other 
  (Illinois) 
  

   di.stinct, 
  but 
  allied 
  to 
  it 
  by 
  the 
  cerci, 
  though 
  with 
  short 
  tegmina 
  (probably 
  Melanoplus 
  viola). 
  It 
  was 
  

   further 
  doubtful 
  whether 
  the 
  female 
  belonged 
  with 
  eitlier 
  of 
  tlie 
  males. 
  Certainly, 
  then, 
  we 
  shall 
  be 
  

   obliged 
  to 
  consign 
  Walker's 
  species 
  to 
  merited 
  oblivion. 
  Probably 
  no 
  one 
  of 
  these 
  specimens 
  is 
  one 
  

   of 
  tbe 
  original 
  types. 
  

  

  7. 
  Calliptamits 
  sanguineipes 
  Serville, 
  Rev. 
  M^th. 
  Orth. 
  (1831), 
  pp. 
  93-94 
  [Acrydium 
  sangvineipes 
  

   Olivier, 
  Eucycl. 
  Meth., 
  VI 
  (1791), 
  p. 
  231]. 
  Surinam. 
  It 
  is 
  very 
  doubtful 
  if 
  this 
  belongs 
  iu 
  the 
  Melan- 
  

   opli. 
  If 
  De 
  Geer's 
  Acridium 
  aeneo-oculatum, 
  is 
  the 
  same 
  > 
  his 
  figure 
  would 
  lead 
  us 
  to 
  presume 
  it 
  did 
  

   not. 
  I 
  have 
  not 
  seen 
  the 
  species. 
  

  

  ' 
  See 
  Serv., 
  Orth., 
  p. 
  670. 
  

  

  