﻿wo. 
  1135. 
  uniTiyas 
  of 
  c. 
  a. 
  jrniTF—sTJXTox. 
  639 
  

  

  Page. 
  

  

  Xadcopf-is 
  remex 
  VT 
  24 
  

  

  N. 
  sliumardi 
  Me. 
  C 
  ? 
  24 
  

  

  Duomphalus 
  subijuadratas 
  ^l. 
  Sc 
  Vt' 
  25 
  

  

  E. 
  ? 
  25 
  

  

  Miirchisonia 
  ' 
  25 
  

  

  Patella 
  ? 
  25 
  

  

  Bellerophon 
  crassiis 
  M. 
  & 
  TV 
  26 
  

  

  IS. 
  montfortianus 
  Xorwood 
  ^t 
  Prntten 
  20 
  

  

  B. 
  ? 
  26 
  

  

  Sedgvickia 
  topekaensis 
  Sbuiiinr<l 
  26 
  

  

  Flevro2>honis 
  ? 
  27 
  

  

  Clidophorus 
  occidentalis 
  Gciiiitz 
  27 
  

  

  Tohlia 
  ? 
  subscitula 
  Meek 
  it 
  Ilaydeii 
  27 
  

  

  Myalina 
  permiana 
  Swallow 
  28 
  

  

  M. 
  aviculoides 
  M. 
  & 
  H 
  28 
  

  

  M. 
  perattenuata 
  M. 
  i^ 
  H 
  28 
  

  

  GervilUa 
  longa 
  Geinilz 
  29 
  

  

  Avicidopecten 
  occidentalis 
  Slmin 
  29 
  

  

  Syringopora 
  ? 
  29 
  

  

  • 
  Spirorhis 
  ? 
  30 
  

  

  Ci/thcre 
  nebratcennif 
  G 
  eiuit 
  z 
  30 
  

  

  193. 
  

  

  AVhite, 
  C. 
  a. 
  On 
  the 
  biological 
  and 
  geological 
  significance 
  of 
  closely 
  similar 
  fossil 
  

   forms. 
  <^Proc. 
  Amer. 
  Assn. 
  Adv. 
  Sci., 
  vol. 
  xxxis, 
  pp. 
  23it-24o. 
  Salem, 
  18!ll. 
  

  

  The 
  author 
  thinks 
  that 
  for 
  geological 
  pnvposes 
  it 
  is 
  often 
  ailvi.sable 
  to 
  give 
  separate 
  names 
  

   ti> 
  fossil 
  species, 
  even 
  though 
  it 
  .should 
  l>e 
  inipracticalile 
  to 
  diagnose 
  them 
  as 
  specifically 
  

   ditt'ereiit 
  from 
  forms 
  whicli 
  are 
  memhers 
  of 
  other 
  and 
  different 
  faunas. 
  

  

  Same. 
  One 
  Imndred 
  extras 
  printed 
  withcuit 
  covers 
  and 
  without 
  repagiug. 
  

  

  194. 
  

  

  "White, 
  C. 
  A. 
  [Remarks 
  upon 
  On 
  the 
  Permian, 
  Triassic, 
  and 
  Jurassic 
  formations 
  

   in 
  the 
  East 
  Indian 
  Archipelago 
  (Timor 
  and 
  Rotti), 
  l)y 
  Doctor 
  Augnst 
  Roth- 
  

   pletz.] 
  Bull. 
  Gcol. 
  Soc. 
  Amer., 
  vol. 
  iii, 
  p. 
  14. 
  Rochester, 
  1891. 
  

  

  Doctor 
  White 
  spoke 
  of 
  this 
  as 
  one 
  of 
  several 
  cases 
  now 
  known 
  of 
  the 
  commingling 
  of 
  

   launal 
  types 
  upon 
  the 
  confines 
  of 
  the 
  Mesozoic 
  and 
  Paleozoic 
  systems, 
  and 
  as 
  indicating 
  a 
  

   condition 
  which 
  we 
  always 
  ought 
  to 
  expect. 
  

  

  195. 
  

  

  White, 
  C. 
  A. 
  [Remarks 
  on 
  Ar4eological 
  Map 
  of 
  South 
  America, 
  by 
  Prolcssor 
  Docti.'r 
  

   Gustav 
  Steinmann.] 
  <^Bull. 
  Geol. 
  Soc. 
  Amer., 
  vol. 
  iii, 
  p. 
  14. 
  Rochester, 
  18'J1. 
  

  

  Doctor 
  White 
  referred 
  especially 
  to 
  the 
  Cretaceous 
  fauna 
  which 
  lie 
  had 
  pnblished 
  for 
  tlu; 
  

   National 
  Museum 
  of 
  Brazil. 
  He 
  said 
  that 
  he 
  found 
  that 
  fauna 
  to 
  have 
  much 
  more 
  alHnity 
  

   with 
  the 
  Cretaceous 
  fauna 
  of 
  Southern 
  India 
  than 
  with 
  that 
  of 
  any 
  portion 
  of 
  tlie 
  Xortli 
  

   American 
  Cretaceous. 
  

  

  196. 
  

  

  White, 
  C. 
  A. 
  [Remarks 
  on 
  The 
  Comanche 
  Series 
  of 
  the 
  Texas-Arkansas 
  Region, 
  by 
  

   Robert 
  T. 
  Hill.] 
  Bull. 
  Geol. 
  Soc. 
  Amer., 
  vol. 
  ii, 
  pp. 
  525, 
  526. 
  Rochester, 
  1891. 
  

  

  Doctor 
  White 
  agreed 
  with 
  the 
  speaker 
  as 
  to 
  the 
  great 
  difficulty 
  of 
  correlating 
  American 
  

   with 
  European 
  series 
  of 
  strata, 
  and 
  mentioned 
  cases 
  of 
  such 
  attempted 
  correlation 
  in 
  which 
  

   the 
  true 
  stratigraphical 
  order 
  was 
  reversed. 
  

  

  197. 
  

  

  White, 
  C. 
  A. 
  [Remarks 
  on 
  Variations 
  in 
  the 
  Cretaceous 
  and 
  Tertiary 
  Strata 
  of 
  

   Alabama, 
  by 
  Daniel 
  W. 
  Langdon.] 
  Bull. 
  Geo' 
  Soc. 
  Amer., 
  vol. 
  iii, 
  p. 
  606. 
  Roch- 
  

   ester, 
  1891. 
  

  

  Doctor 
  While 
  mentioned 
  the 
  difficulty 
  of 
  determining 
  the 
  limitations 
  of 
  the 
  ditferent 
  recog 
  

   nized 
  divisions 
  of 
  the 
  Cretaceous 
  of 
  the 
  Gulf 
  States, 
  either 
  paleontologically 
  or 
  lithologically. 
  

  

  