( 410 ) 



white, much more stronglj' dark-sijeckled, the speckling olive-brown rather than 

 dark fascons ; discal spot of forewing reduced, less distinctly ocellated, the two 

 subapical costal spots farther apart, the proximal reduced, the distal nearer apex 

 and increased to a strongly dentate thick line, reaching to R' or nearly to R^. 

 In the (S the white thoracic blotch encloses less, and less definite, dark marking, 

 but its posterior part is more extended transversely ; in the ? the dorsnm of 

 abdomen is mainly dark fuscous. The d, as in fmi/mi'iitafa, has the abdominal 

 margin of the hindwing whitish ; in the ? it remains green. In fniffmentata the 

 venation is normal, D(' of forewing a rather deep but regular curve, of hindwing 

 curved, becoming oblirjue, with R-' — M' well stalked ; in isogamia it is as in the 

 iridescens group and in Oxijchora, DC^ acutely inangled, hindwing with M' varying 

 from connate to short-stalked. The pencil beneath base of forewing is white, as in 

 fiagmentata. 



Mount Goliath, January— February 1911 (A. S. Meek), 3 c? J and 1 ? in coll. 

 Rothschild. 



43. Anisozyga orbimaculata magnificata subsp. nov. 



S, 35-36 mm. Larger than typical orbimaculata Warr. {Noi\ Zool. xiv. 129) 

 from Biagi, the deeply Innnlate-dentate proximal white line not or scarcely inter- 

 rupted, the white distal markings less grey-dusted, enlarged, especially the 

 " bracket-shaped " marks of the antepenultimate series between R' and M-, which 

 form distinct, broad, confluent patches ; a white discal dot is present on the forewing; 

 the apical blotch of the hindwing is darker than in Warren's typo and less regularly 

 rounded : uniform ])nrple-fuscous, or at lightest dull rnfous internally instead of 

 whitish pink, and with a broader and darker purple-fuscous circumscription ; but 

 I gather from the description that this spot varies in colour in the Biagi form. 

 Abdomen with a rather large purple-fuscous blotch on fifth abdominal, which is 

 only indicated by a few dark scales in the type form ; the white dorsal dots well 

 developed. 



Mount Goliath, January — February 1911 (A. S. Meek), 1 S S in coll. 

 Rothschild, showing no variation except in colour of apical blotch of hindwing. 



44. Anisozyga decorata goliathensis subsp. nov. 



<?. Only different in a few not very striking, but apparently constant characters 

 from decorata decorata from the Angabunga River {Nov. Zool. xiii. j). 79). (Postal 

 spot at origin of antemedian line scarcely wider than the line it.self ; tornal blotch 

 of forewing smaller, reduced on the underside to a few fuscous scales; subapical 

 blotch of hindwing less elongate, leaving a patch of the ground-colonr from the tooth 

 at the end of R' almost to the apex, whereas in decorata decorata it extends right to 

 the tooth at end of R'. 



Mount Goliath, January — February lit 11 (A. S. Meek), 5 c?cJ in coll. 

 Rothschild. 



Rather Ijrighter green than desolata Warr. {Noc. Zool. xiv. p. 12(i), which has 

 no tornal blotch to forewing, a larger discal mark, whiter postmediau line, larger 

 and rather brighter subapical blotch to hindwing, etc. 



45. Anisozyga bifuscata spec. nov. 



(?, 32-3G mm. Head and face green. Palpus fuscous, its underside and the 

 extremities of second and third joints white. Thorax green above, white beneath, 



1 



