366 Correction by Dr. Hare. 
INTELLIGENCE AND MISCELLANIES. 
I. DOMESTIC. 
thesis of Sir Humphrey, his argument is still imperfect, for 
it by no means establishes the doctrine of the materiality of 
heat to prove that Davy has failed of showing that it is a pro- 
duct of motion.” It seems to me that it were just as reasona- 
ble to object to the 1st proposition in Euclid because it does 
the same time. 
We have all laughed at the recipe for cooking a Carp, 
which begins, “First catch your Carp.” I wish it were 
equally superfluous to say to our modern critics, when you 
about to eriticise an essay, first read the essay, or at least 
do not overlook the title!!! Before concluding, I ought, 
in justice, to acknowledge that, in his notice of my galvanic 
tus, Prof. Olmsted has awarded me more merit than I 
aim ; so that as far as good will is concerned the account is 
Eee bee gerne pord 
_ dn the last paragraph of the 3d | of my reply, the wo 
** learning”? is piece for * coat ad He x athe ar- 
corbonicometer” “+ carbonicomet 
ticle “ orboni 
