^°l9^s"^] Fourteenth Supplement to the A. O. U. Check-List. 395 



528. Acanthis linaria vs. .1. flammca (cf. Hartert, A'ooel pal. 

 Fauna, I, 1903, 77). No change required {cf. Hartert, 

 Orn. Monatsb., 1907, 97). 



5o0a. Ammodramus maritimus peninsulae and 550c, A. m. fisheri 



vs. A. m. macfjUUvraii {cf. ^YAYXE, Auk, 1906, 66, 67). These 

 proposed changes seem to be unadvisable at present. 



570o. Junco phseonotus dorsalis vs. J. dorsalifi {cf. Ridgway, 

 Bull. U. S. Nat. Mus., No. 50, Pt. I, 1901, 297). The pro- 

 posed change is not adopted, since intergradation is believed 

 to occur. 



581 y. Melospiza cinerea [= melodia] juddi. This proposed 

 elimination from the Check-List {cf. Ridgway, Bull. U. S. 

 Nat. Mus., No. 50, Pt. I, 1901, 356) is believed to be un- 

 necessary. 



Melospiza coronaforum Grinnell & Daggett, Auk, 1903, 34. 

 This is thought to be equivalent to M. melodia clcmentoe, and is not 

 admitted. 



583a. Melospiza lincolni striata vs. M. I. gracilis Kittlitz {cf. 

 Oberhokser, Proc. Biol. Soc. Wash., XIX, 1906, 42). Not 

 accepted, Kittlitz's description being too brief to permit of 

 certain identification. 



585f/. Passerella iliaca stephensi vs. Passerella sfephensi {cf. Grin- 

 nell, Auk, 1905, 388). The proposed change in status 

 appears to be unwarranted. 



Passerella iliaca annectens Ridgway, Bull. U. S. Nat. Mus., No. 

 50, Pt. I, 1901, 30, and 



Passerella iliaca annectens vs. P. i. meruloides {cf. Grinnell, 

 Condor, IV, 1902, 45). Both annectens and meruloides are be- 

 lieved to represent one form, which is inseparable from P. i. in- 

 sularis. 



591a. Pipilo fuscus albigula vs. P. alhigula {cf. Ridgway, Bull. 

 U. S. Nat. Mus., No. 50, Pt. I, 1901, 433). This proposed 

 change in status is thought unnecessary. 



