396 Fourteenth Supplement to the A. O. U. Check-List. [f^^, 



Cardincdis cardinalis magnirostris Bangs, Proc. N. E. Zool. 

 Club, IV, 1903, 6. The characters ascribed to this form are too 

 slight for recognition. 



608. Piranga erythromelas vs. P. mexicana (cf. Oberholser, 

 Proc. Biol. Soc. ^^ash., XIX, 1906, 43). The proposed change 

 is rejected, on the ground that mexicana is based on Seba, whose 

 plate and description are better applicable to CarcJInali.t than 

 to Piranga. 



C32r. Vireo huttoni obscurus vs. I", hutfoni (cf. Anderson & 

 Grinnell, Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila., 1903, 12). The 

 proposed change in status is believed to be unwarranted. 



Vireo hellii arizonoe Ridgway, Proc. Biol. Soc. Wash., XVI, 

 1903, 108. Not admitted, on the ground that it is a synonym of 

 J', h. 'piisiUus. 



Vireo maiUiardornm Grinnell, Condor, \, 1903, 157. The 

 characters alleged for this form appear to be too slight for recogni- 

 tion. 



Vermivora celata orestera Oberholser, Auk, 1905, 243. Not 

 admitted, on the ground of insufficient characters. 



Compsofhii/pis americana ramalince Ridgway, Bull. U. S. Nat. 

 INIus., No. 50, Pt. II, 1902, 486. Not considered worthy of recog- 

 nition. 



Perissoglossa vs. full genus {cf. Maynard, Warblers of New 

 England, 1905, 13). A change in status thought to be unadvisable. 



Neodendroica and Cincrosa jNIaynard, Warblers of New Eng- 

 land, 1901-05, 58, 69, 110. These proposed genera are considered 

 unnecessary, being based upon color characters. 



081. Geothlypis trichas vs. G. t. ignofa (cf. Chapman, Auk, 1907, 

 30-34). The proposed change is believed to be unnecessary. 



[695.] Motacilla ocularis vs. M. alba ocularis (cf. Hartert, 

 Vogel pal. Fauna, III, 1905, 307). The proposed change 

 in status appears to be unwarranted. 



