^'°190S^^] fourteenth Supplement to the A. 0. U. Check-List. 397 



Budytes flavus leucostriatus vs. B. f. similima (c/. Hartert, 

 Vogel pal. Fauna, III, 1905, 289). No change is required, since 

 the Alaskan bird had been previously named alascensis by Ridgway, 

 whose name was accepted in the last Supplement (Auk, 1904, 417). 



697. Anthus pensilvanicus [ = mbescens] vs. A. spinolcita pcn- 

 silvanicus (cf. Hartert, Vogel pal. Fauna, III, 1905, 282). 

 Actual intergradation is believed to be unknown. 



Toxostoma rcdivivum helva Thayer & Bangs, Proc. N. E. 

 Zool. Club, IV, 1907, 17. Not deemed sufficiently distinct for 

 recognition. 



716. Salpinctes guadeloupensis vs. S. obsoletus guadcloupensis 

 (cf. RiDGWAY, Bull. U. S. Nat. Mus., No. 50, Ft. Ill, 1904, 

 650). The proposed change in status is thought to be inex- 

 pedient. 



Caihcrpes mexicanus poliopterus Oberholser, Auk, 1903, 197. 

 This is rejected as being based on intergrades of several adjacent 

 forms. 



Thnjomancs bewickii cerroensis. 



Thrijomanes beivickii drymoicus. 



Thryomanes bewickii ncwphilus. 



Tkryomancs beivickii ercmophilus, and 



719.1. Thryomanes leucophrys vs. T. bewickii leucophry.s- (cf. 

 RiDGWAY, Bull. U. S. Nat. Mus., No. 50, Ft. Ill, 1904, 557- 

 563). The proposed additions and change in status are not 

 accepted, for reasons given in the Tenth Supplement (Auk> 

 1901, 313-314). 



Parus (Lophophanes) bicolor fioridanus Bangs, Auk, 1898, 181 

 (cf. Hellmayr, Tierreich, Lief. 18, 1903, 42). The characters 

 of this form are too slight and inconstant for recognition. The 

 Committee gave an adverse decision also in the Ninth Supplement. 



Baeolophus wollwebcri annexufi (cf. Ridgway, Bull. U. S. Nat. 

 Mus., No. 50, Ft. Ill, 1904, 393). Not admitted, since it proves 

 to be indistinguishable from true wollwebcri. 



