3l8 Te7ith Siipplement to the A. O. U. Check-List. [^^"j^ 



514^;. Amphispiza belli nevadensis vs. A. nevade7isis {cf. 

 Grinnell, Auk, XV, 1898, 59; Fisher, ibid. 190). 



Melospiza fasciata caiirina' Ridgway, Auk, XVI, Jan. 1899, 



36. 

 Melospiza fascia fa cooper i Ridgway, ibid. 35. 

 Melospiza fasciata pusinuia Ridgway, ibid. 35. 

 Melospiza fasciata ifigersolli McGregor, Bull. Cooper Orn. 



Club, I, 1899, 35. 

 Melospiza melodia cleo?iensis McGregor, ibid. 87. 

 Melospiza melodia kenaiensis Ridgway, Auk, XVII, Jan., 1900, 



29. 

 Melospizm sanaka McGregor, Condor, III, Jan. 1901, 87. 



(Separates issued Nov. 25, 1900). 

 Passerella iliaca fuligiuosa Ridgway, Auk, XVI, Jan. 1899, 



36. 

 Passerella iliaca a/i/iectens Ridgway, Auk, XVII, Jan. 1900, 



3°- 

 Passerella iliaca insular is Ridgway, ibid. 30. 

 Passerella iliaca townseiidi Ridgway, ibid. 30. 



612. Petrochelidon lunifrons Say vs. P. pyrrJwnota (Vieill.) . 

 {Cf. Sharpe tit Wyatt, Mon. Hirun. II, 523, et. seq.). 



Laniiis ludovicianus ?/iigrans W. Palmer, Auk, XV, July^ 

 1898, 248. 

 While the form appears entitled to recognition there are ques- 

 tions of sjaionymy in the case which are likely to affect the name. 



GeotJilypis trichas brachidactyla (Swains.), W. Palmer, Auk, 

 XVII, July, 1900, 221. 



681/a Geothlypis trichas ignota vs. G. t. roscoe. (Cf. W. 

 Palmer, Auk, XVII, July, 1900, 221; Chapman, ibid. 

 389 ; Palmer and Chapman, ibid. XVIII, April, 1901, 197, 

 198.) 



