Novitates Florje Caucasi. 325 



BH^HHe. BCB 9K3eMMflpH Cb KOpotfoqKaMH, BBBTOHOaiKH OTTOIIHpeHHIM, 



lamejiHCTHKH pa3a bb 3 Kopoie BBBTOHoraeKB. Kopotfoqo rjydoKO 

 fao cepeflBHEi) BBiearaaTaa, ci KpyrjniHH aommb, mnpe CBoefi kjihhh, ct, 

 ffiejre3HCTHMH pBCHHnaMH no KpaaMB. IlepBOHaqajiBBO a Hamwrb ero 

 8-ro ima 1891 r., 9K3eMniapB cobcbmb cTapaff, a BTopnqHO co6npajr& 

 ero 18 Maa 1892 r. bb tomb ate btbctb bo3jtb KpBiMCKofl waHBnBi 

 (KydaH. o6ji.) Ha BaajKHNXB hhsmchhuxb MicTax'B. 9R3eMraapBi coBep- 

 meHHO THnHqHH. 



[OoKa3aHie jrefletfypa Ma JThtbh, BBpoatHo, HeBipHo]. 



reorpai|)MM. pacnpocTpaHeHie: cpe^aaa n roamaa EBpona. 



Salvia ringens Libth, et 8m. 



Boissier, Flora Oriental IV, 600. 



XuncKiu, H3d£a. ctB. KaBKaaa (3aa. KieB. 06m. Ect. XI, 55). 



Sipthorp, Flora Graeca I, tab. 18. 



Gartenflora (Kegel), 1853, tab. 59. 



Prius speciminibus originariis non visis ob defectum in foliis 

 pilorum glanduliferorum et ob foliola lateralia pauciora (saepissime 

 2 paria, nee 3-7, ut ex deseriptione datur) pro varietate S.ringentis 

 existimavi ((3. Pontica m.). Nunc vero videns specimina multa e 

 Graecia (ex herb. Orphanideo, Heldreichiano) nullam differentiam ob- 

 servo inter mea et haec specimina originaria: in his quoque pili 

 glanduliferi in foliis deficiunt et numerus foliolorum lateralium cum 

 meis congruit, saepissime non excedens 2. Species haec crescit sat 

 abunde in collibus circa Novorossijsk, ubi quotannis (1889 — 92) 

 observabam; non raro autem fere ad mare descendit; anno 1892 ad 

 Anapam quoque detexi; semina saepe legi quae ab Horto Botanico 



_y*e i 



. BeinTay, mhoh Ha 

 3 HMte-r-b orpoMHoe pacnpocTpaHesie (ciuibHO pac- 

 in,in h lUBenJH h ^ajite Ha boctokt. 

 W A*yHrapiH h THMa-iaeB-B. IIpiopnTen> 3a 3 



