1817, 
Chemical Classification of Minerals. a7, 
Lime. Pitch-stone, 
Native, Gabronite, 
Nitrate, F at-stone, 
Subphosphate, (Silex, argilla, and soda.§ 
Phosphate, Sodalite, 
Sulphate, Analcime, 
§ 1. Anbydrous, Chabasic, 
§ 2. Gypsum, Dipyre, 
Carbonate, Hyalite, 
§ 1. Arragonite, ayerperite, + 
§ 2. Common carbonate, Prehnite, 
Magnesian carbonate, Mesotypes 
Dioptase, Stilbite, p 
Fluor, Laumonite, 
Datholite, Aplome, 
Arseniate of lime, Hauyne, 
Tungstate of lime. (Silex, ene and glu- 
cine, 
Silex. Emerald and beryl. 
Quartz, Euclase, 
(Silex and water,) (Silex, argilla, and ba- 
Opal, rytes,) 
(Silex and alumina,) Staurolite, 
Calcedony, (Silex, argilla, and oxide 
§ 1. Calcedony, of iron,) 
§ 2. Jasper, * Anthophyllite, 
Iolite, Axinite, 
(Silex, alumina, apd wa~ Tourmaline, 
ter,) Garnet, 
Bildstein, Epidote, 
Rocksoap, Hornblende or actinolite, 
(Silex, alumina, and pot- Actinolite ? t 
ash,) (Silex and magnesia,) 
Feldspar, \ Talc, 
Triphane, Asbestus, 
Lepidolite, Bronzite ? § 
Mica, Olivine, 
Leucite, Jade? 
(Silex, argilla, potash, (Silex, lime, &c.) 
and soda,) Schaalstein, 
* Jasper: the iron that is often abundant in this is not apparently sufficiently 
eonstant to make a species, 
+ Wernerite: this includes scapolite. One or two per cent. of alcali does not 
seem sufficient to separate them, In general, any quantity of an ingredient less 
than five per cent, is deemed accidental; butina few instances, as with respect to 
the alkalies, that quantity seems characteristic, and is noticed, 
t Actinolite of Bournon analysis not known; but its characters are so like 
those of hornblende, that its analysis probably would not differ materially. 
§ Bronzite: query if the magnesia in this arises from the serpentine tbat in- 
eludes it, or is it distinct from swaragdite, 
