Caricography. 143 
nist, was a posthumous publication. I shall give his species in the 
order and under the number published in his Descriptio, and make 
such remarks as the examination renders proper, premising that the 
species are commonly in separate leaves in the herbarium, and of 
very easy reference. To J. Vaughan, Esq. I wish to offer my ac- 
knowledgments for his polite attention in giving me access to the 
herbarium, and also to Dr. C. Pickering for the aid afforded me in 
the examination. It is due to the memory of Dr. Muhlenberg to 
say, that some of the specimens may have been misplaced, even 
though undesigned, by some who have examined this collection of 
_ 
ices. Remarks. 
I. C. ttorilis, Exactly the same with ours. 
2. — cephalophora. Do. 
3. — bromoides. Do. 
4, —retroflexa. Do. 
5, — stipata. Do. 
6. — Muhlenbergit. Do. 
” 
— multiflora. Do. 
8. — sparganioides. Do., but with it is a C. Muhlenbergii, and 
the new and distinct C. setacea. 
9. — rosea. Has a C. curta with it, while ours agree 
: with both. 
10. — paniculata. Exactly like our plant. 
11. — scirpoides. Do., but has a C. curta with it. 
12. —lagopodioides. Do. 
13, — scoparia. Do.—Has the new C. tenera with it. 
14, — foenea. The plants under this name are labelled 
with a query, but are probably the plant 
he intended. If C. foenea has been 
found north of Pennsylvania, it has prob- 
ably been confounded with C. festucacea. 
There is one of the new C. cristata, in 
the same leaf with this species, from the 
southern states. 
. — straminea. Exactly our plant, but has the new C. cris- 
tata with it. C. straminea has its name 
ie the chaffy appearance of the spike- 
— 
ov 
16. — erinita. vical C. erinita and C. paleacea— 
ours the same. 
