40. C. festucacea. | 
41. — tetanica. 
42. — laxiflora. 
43, — hystericina. 
44. — pseudocyperus. 
5. — flexuosa. 
46. — 
47. — digitalis. 
48. — anbeliaic. 
49. — miltacea. 
50. — trichocarpa. 
51. — pellita. 
52. — riparia. | 
53. — vesicaria. 
54. — verrucosa. 
55. — recurva ? 
Vou. ZAVemNO. I. 
Caricography. 145 
Remarks. 
is so different from his plant, I think these 
specimens must have been misplaced. 
Is now well ascertained, and the specimens 
agree with those of Muhlenberg, although 
the plant which has commonly been called 
_ by this name is altogether distinct. C. 
festucacea has clubform spikelets in matu- 
_ rity. 
The specimens so named are clearly the true 
C. conoidea, Schk., and the real C. teta- 
nica, Schk. is not inthe herbarium. Muh- 
lenberg doubted whether his plant was the 
one intended by Schk. I have found it 
with the blasted capsules, so finely depict- 
ed on one of the figures by Schkubr. 
Ours are 
Do. 
Do. 
Do.—Has the new c gracillima cs it. 
Without a name, but is the new C. Tor- 
reyana. 
Is not in the herbarium, sat is supposed now 
to be well ascertained. 
Exactly ours, but the common variety, vici- 
na, is not among them. 
Precisely ours. 
Do 
Do.—Has C. filiformis with it. 
Do., but which we call C. lacustris, and 
Muhlenberg says it is thus named by 
Willdenow. 
Do. 
A strange mistake has been made on this 
plant, as it is C. sempervirens, Ell., but 
the name of Muhlenberg must be retnins 
ed. The D. verrucosa in this Journal is 
wholly distinct. 
Is the C. Cherokeensis, as it is certainly not 
the C. recurva, Schk. and others. 
19 
