380 



[Vol. 2 



ANNALS OF TILE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN 



230. Lecytlridaceae 



231. Rhizophoraceae 



232. Comhretaceae 



233. Mvrtaceae 



234. Melastomataceae 



235. Onagraceae 



236. Trapaceae 



236. Hydrocaryaceae 



237. Haloragidaceae 

 237. 



252. Primiila< c ir 



253. 



Plumbaginaceae 



254. Sapotaceae 



255. Diospyraceae 



255. 



Ebenaceae 



256. Styracaceae 



257. Symplocaceae 



258. Oloacoae 2 



259. Salvadoraceae 



275. Bignoniaceae 



276. Pedaliaceae 



277. Martyniaceae 

 27S. Orohancbaceae 



270. Gesneriacoae 



280. Columelliaceae 



281. Pinguiculaoeae 



281. 



Lentil ulariaceae 



Halorrhagidaceae 260. Loganiaceae 



282. (.Jlobulariaceae 

 2 S3. Acantbaceae 



Umbelliferae 3 



238. Cynomoriaceae 



239. Araliacoao 2 



240. Apiaceae 



240. 



241. Cornaceae 



242. Cletbraceae 



243. Pyrolaceae 



244. Monotropaceae 



243. 



261. Gentianacvae 



262. Menyanthacoae 



261. 1 



262. J 



Gcntianaccdc 



284. 

 285. 



2S6. 



Myoporaceae 



Phrymaceae 



Plantaginaceae 



244. 



Pyrolaceae 



263. Apocynacoao 



264. Asclepiadaceae 



265. Oonvolvulaceae 



266. Cuscutaceaa 



265. 

 266. 



Conrolvulaccae 



245. Lennoaceae 



246. Ericaceae 



247. Vacciniaceae 



Ericaceae 



246. 



247 



248. Epacridaceae 



249. Diapensiaceae 



250. Theophrastaceae 



251. Myrsinaceae 



267. Polemoniaerae 



268. Hydrophyllaceae 



269. Boraginaceae 



270. Verbenaceae 



271. Mentbaceae 



271. 



1 Aib lata 



272. Nolanaccae 



273. Solanaceac 9 



274. Sc rophulariaceae 



287. Rubiaceae 



288. Caprifoliaoeae 



289. Adoxaceae 



290. ValerianaceM 



291. Dipsacaceae 



292. Cucurbitaceae 3 



293. ( ampanulaceae 



294. Gk>odeiiiaceae 



295. Candolleaceae 



296. Calyceraceae 



297. Cichoriaceae 



298. Ambrosiaceae 



299. Asteraceae 



297. 



298. 

 299. 



Compositae 3 



The widest gap, it will be observed, is between Cruciferae 

 and Rosaceae, but I believe this represents nothing more than 

 lack of knowledge. 



Also I should like to list the genera within the limits of 

 which one or more species are now said to be subject to attack, 

 because many of these genera contain plants of great economic 

 importance. Where I have some personal knowledge of the 

 subject I have italicized the genus name, and in what follows 

 the reader will naturally expect me to draw illustrations prin- 

 cipally from the diseases most familiar to me. 



TABLE IT 



SHOWING GENERA OF FLOWERING PLANTS SUBJECT TO DISEASES OF BACTERIAL ORIGIN 



Macrozamia 

 Pi n u 5 

 Dactylis 



Bromus 

 Zea 



Andropogon 



Avena 



Kacchamm 



Triticum 



Phleum 

 Poa 



Cocos 



