it4 J. R. T H O R B E C K E 



T« l^i^j 5r^«AiJ<pf/» TU%«v tJ |tt£»' e?ii~Txi , tI Sf (psu^iTxi' xx) p^ov ys ohsi rl a-xXij/jSi/ vxfck 

 rlv Airi t«i/ SoyiUiaera)!' , oti ouSti/ l^wUv Toirav irpsa^i^xl^st , KxSxTsp stsTvoi. UilJe igitur 

 efficit Sextus ( l ) : ori tVr/ Suj^arJi/ k»tx,. rpomv fiiouv aipou/ihoug riiv %sp) ttxvtuv swO' 

 j^tiv. Nimirum kxtx xfxyKtjv y,«p Iht tov xTopfTiKioi Cfi)Xo7o($ouvTx , jti^ sU Th ■!rxvTs>~ht 

 ivsvipyijTov o»T« , Kx) iv Txl^ KXTx tIv piov 7rpx^s7iv xTpxxTOV , sx^'" " xpfr^ipiov «iphsat 

 ajix Kx) (puyi^i, Tourhri to cpxiiopt,svov ( 2 ). Igitur apparentia minime tollic Scepti- 

 cus (3), sed iirs) /XH luvxTxi xvsvspy>tTCi TrxvTxirxuiv slvxi (4), kxtcc tov Cpi/.ilTcCpov ^i- 

 ^oy quidera Scepticus non vivit (5) sed kxtx riiv i^/^Jjo^ov riipijTiv (6), qnam vocat 

 Sexit/s (7) TMv PiuTiKiiv Tijpmiv, quae quatuor constet partlbiis (8). Sceptici igitur 

 nulla ratione philosophiam suam cum vita conjunxerunt, aut in consensum adduce* 

 re sunt conati: yjiim inquit Sexttis (9) xyxUv n vi kxkIv slvxi ^syivTuv oilsv , (jlst^. 

 Tou iri^xih flvxi vopi!i,siv ^xnsv , «AA' xh^xvTug sjropisvaiv r^ /3'V » ivx piit civsvspy^Tot 

 Snsv (10).. 



Criterium , ut tJkoi; , distinxit Sextus duplcx theoreiicttm et practicum. Cli)> si« 

 ve cognoscendi criterium et agcndi. Cura priore sibi nullam oninino rem esse dice- 

 bant (12): adhacrebant modo posteriori , ex quo in communi vita alia agebant , alia 

 non agebant. Nirairum acquiescebant in sensuum auctoritate: nam quamvts ex cpxir 

 vonhm nulla omnino conclusio esset ad res. ipsas, tanien ratione nostrum cpxiTxvlxv 

 Statuebant iv jrslasi kx) eiioouK-/iTcp TrxSsi Ksipisvtjv x^iT^rov shxi (13). Igitur criterium 

 assumebant to Cpxivii^svov (.14); nara 'Sio vsp) ij,sv rou CpxhsjOxi rsUv ij roTov rh u;roxslpts' 

 vov, culsii; hai ci(iCp,Jti>iTsl' zsfi II rsu sl TOislJTilv hri oiiolov Cpxlvsrxi, ^■'}Ti7rxi (15). 



Std 



CO 1. I. §. I«8. Cl) Ad». Math. VII. §. 3». (3>- Vid. P. H. I. $.' 13. c. I6. tstum S. »r. siq.. 



C4) 1. I- ?• 23. f 5^ Adv. Maih. XI. §. 165. (.&) Ibid. C7J P. U. I. S. 23. 



(8) Vid. P H. 1. 1. $. 23, S4, 238, 17. conf. Fabric, ad §. 2!. not. D. C 9 J '• L §■ 226. 



(ig) Vid. quoque P. B. 11; j. 10:, 144 — 247, 254, 257, 25«. IH. $. a , ISI,235 — 33«^ alv. Math. r. 

 J. 23, 176—180, sji — »36. VII. §. 29, 3C,- 



ContiDeiur auteni Scepticismus, tamqu»n mcniiS' habiius rstione ttaeorctica, ncqiie aliam signiiicationcm af- 

 ftrt, qiiam deiuonstat ontm realiiaiis Objectorura extcrncrum extra poiestaiem esse ration;s thcoreticae. Cui 

 Scepiicismi notioiii consentantum esi , eju^s auctoritarem H!in'me persuasicncm snbjectivam agcndique rationeiB 

 coraplecti. Igiiur siniulac non amplius quaeriiur de exierna realitaie fibecioriim . Sccpticisrous coniicesciti et 

 viia, usus ac rano practica subjectivam veriiatem ncs ccguni confundere cum objecti\'a : ncqr.c cniui ra;io io 

 trsu communi distinguit objeciiim in noiit ne ei objceium txtra nutionem. Conf J, C, Rtitze ,, iib. d. Kant. 

 ReliFion inncrlr d, Grcn^cn d. bloss Vernunft, p j. sqq. p. ir, sqq, p. 17. Ilac in rc Sccptico par fere 

 causa est cum ldeal:siai de quo vid. Kmg Neues O^.eanon, J. 5^ '?• 3"« " 46. et laid. ab eo fhiio^oph, 

 Jonrn. B. V. H. 4. p. 3»», 6S- 



CiO P. H. I. S. 34. Jl. ;. 14^ >dT. Mith. VII. $. s9, 30. (i<) P. Hi I. S. zi. 



(J3) Ibid. S. 31. (i4>( 1. c. (15; IbiJ. 



