9 
a 
Gen. p. 151), Thunberg’s — was indicated = aay to it. t 
two years later, Gawler figured (Bot. Mag ) as B. spathacea 
other species, which 8 sed as Gladiolus 
spathaceus, Thunb. ; but it is utterly different from soca v= t his 
figure exactly ag with calis s 
rium named B hacea, and one motlncted. in Little 
k n ag. 
t. 638 is perfectly distinct from both B. disticha and B. mucronata, 
I propose that it should bear the name B. Gawleri.—N. E. Brown. 
Figs. 1 ei , bracteoles; 3, anthers; 4, upper part of style and stigmas; 4, ovary. 
Ail enlarged 
