'/^"=':-.- -■ 



I 



I I- 



1 



h 



THE AMEEICA]^ . BISOIS^S. 



235 



I 



I 

 I 



'J \. 



N .,! 



I 



there is the same conspicuous absence of the remains of this animal. These 

 evidences; negative and incomplete as they are, make it at least probable 

 that the buffalo was unknown to the people who built the mounds and pre- 

 ceded the tribes which were found here, bj the whites, in the seventeenth 

 century. The same arguments warrant us in supposing that the Bison laii- 

 frons^ w^ith its contemporaries, — the musk ox, the elephant, and the masto- 

 don,— had vanished before the advent of this race, or at least before 



r 



time of which w^e have evidence in the fossils already found. 



I have long been of the opinion, without claiming originality therein, that 

 the tribes which built the mounds and the shapely measured forts of this 



r \ X 



region were driven to the southward by an invasion of other tribes coming 

 from the northward and northwestwai'd. In the Memoirs now in preparation, 

 concerning the ancient peoples of this region, it will be claimed, on what 

 seems to Mr. Lucian Carr, ethnologist of the Survey, and to myself, sufficient 



r 



evidence, that these mound-building peoples were essentially related to the 

 Natchez group of Indians, and were driven southward by the ruder tribes 

 of the somewhat related tribes which occupied the northern parts of the 

 Mississippi Valley, when w^e first knew it. All this seems to me to have a 

 possible significance in the problem of the coming of the buffalo; when we 

 remember that the Indians north of the Ohio were much in the habit of 

 burning the forests, and so making open plains, or prairies, and that,' as Mr. 

 Allen has well pointed out, the buffalo cannot penetrate far into the denser 

 forests, it may be that it was this destruction of forests that laid the way 

 open to their entrance. The so-called Barrens of Kentucky, the southward 

 extension of the Wabash prairies,,giye us evidence on this point. As soon as 

 the Indians were driven away, these Kentucky prairies sprang up in timber, 

 and are now densely wooded. The same is in part true of the other prairies 



of the Ohio Valley. I am inclined to think that the forcing back of the 

 timber line from the Mississippi is principally due to the burning of the 

 forests by the aborigines in their eastward working, aided by the continued 

 decrease of the rainfall, which I believe to have been a concomitant of the 

 disappearance of the glacial period.* The question of the origin of the buf- 

 falo and its relation to the earliest tribes of people in this district is made 

 still more complicated by the fact that there is no doubt that there Avas an 



^ 



earlier and closely related species of buffalo in this district, probably coeval 

 with the mammoth and mastodon, and possibly with the caribou and elk, 



* Notes on the cause and geological value of variations in rainfall. Vol. XVIIIj p. 176, et seq. Pro- 

 ceedings of the Boston Society of Natural History. 



■ 



II ■ 



W i 



^1 I 



'1 I 



[ I 



f ■ 



L J 



I 

 I 



ni 



^1 ' 



1 1 



'1 



:|1 



'i 



. ■ i 



\ . 



'1 ■". 



\y'v 





- H 





- J 



:; -A 





j!i 



\: 



m 



' 'l' 



|l" 



iJ'il: 



I ' ^^ 



F : 



!1^ 



\\ 



1 



ii 



q ■ 





k 



^ n ^^^LVJ n XL-j_ 



