92 . NEW PUBLICATIONS. 
rate, of them have been submitted to the inspection of Sir J. E. Smith. 
JI, argenteum is marked by Drummond ^^ H, glaiwum,'^ and Smith has 
written upon the label, "Whose name is glancum? Surely 'tis not 
"Willdenow's, No. 39. I have nothing like this named or unnamed, 
but it cannot be described from this specimen." //. cahnduliJlo7'um, 
Drummond has marked "No. 33, species nova;" and Smith writes: 
" II.j)uw.ilum, Wind., mentioned in E. El. vol. iii. p. 366." Some of 
the specimens are marked by Mr. Bobertson as liuving been received 
in December, 1824. 
HUTCHINSIA JLFINA, 
With 
on record with regard to the possibility of this being an Ingleborough 
plant, (Journ. of Dot. Vol. L p. 359,) I may mention that in the collec- 
tion of the late William Backhouse, of Darlington and Wolsingbara, so 
unfortunately destroyed through being lent to me at the time when my 
house was burnt, there was a specimen of this under the name of 
Lepidium petrmm^ marked as having been received from ]\Ir. Caley 
about the year 1790. (Speaking from memory only, I forget the exact 
date.) No station was given; but, as in all probability this is the 
same Mr. Caley who collected plants in the Settle district, a note of the 
fact seems worth placing by the side of what Mr. Newbould has 
stated.— J. G. Baker. 
NEW FUBLICATIONS. 
Iragmenia Fhytograplics Audrali^. Auctore F. Muller, Ph.D. 
Vol. IV. Ease. XXVII.-XXIX. Melbourne, 1864. 
These three fasciculi are a valuable addition to a work justly ap- 
preciated by all systematic botanists, and they contain a great number 
of new plants, and improved generic and specific characters of old ones. 
We notice the following new genera :—J[ficA/ca (Epacrldea), Mackin^ 
f)» Mackinlaya 
p}, and Haussmannia 
