Vol. XX 

 1903 



] Tzvclfth Supplement to the A. O. U. Check-List. 36^5 



*Speotyto cunicnhtria becki Rothschild & Hartert, Novit. 

 Zool., IX, 1902, 405. 



*39Ga. Dryobates scalaris lucasanus vs. D. lucasauus {cf. 

 Brewster, Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., XLI, 1902, 102). 



Picoidcs arcticus feniiirostris Bangs, Auk, 1900, 131. 



*407/>. Melanerpes formicivorus angustifrons vs. M. 



angustifroiis {cf. Brewster, Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., XLI, 

 1902, 105). 



*Myiarchus crijiitits residuns Howe, Contr. Amer. Orn., I, 

 1902, 30. 



*458«. Sayornis nigricans semiatra vs. ^. nigricans {cf. 

 Brewster, Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool, XLI, 1902, 119). 



Contopus vs. Horizopiis {cf. Oberholser, Auk, 1899, 331). 



*Contopus richardso)ii saturatus Bishop, Auk, 1900, 116. 



*Otocoris alpcstris aphmsta Oberholser, Proc. U. S. Nat. 

 Mus., XXIV, 1902, 860. 



*Cyanocitta stelleri carbotiacea {cf. W. K. Fisher, Condor, 

 1902, 41). 



*Agelaius phceniccHS richnw)idi {cf. Ridgway, Bull. U. S. Nat. 

 Mus., No. 50, pt. II, 1902, 335). 



*501J. Sturnella magna neglecta vs. S. negkcta {cf. 

 Ridgway, /. c, 365). 



*503. Icterus audubonii vs. /. melanocephahis audubo)ii {cf. 

 Ridgway, /. c, 282). 



Loxia curvirostra hendirei {cf. Merriam, N. Am. Fauna, No. 

 16, 1899, 123; Ridgway, Bull. U. S. Nat. Mus., No. 50, 

 pt. I, 1901, 50). 



*544J. Ammodramus rostratus halophilus vs. A. r. gut- 

 tatus {cf. Brewster, Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., XLI, 1902, 

 139)- 



