80 GROTE & ROBINSON. 



Samea elealis, Walk., p. 351, belongs to Botys Le<l.^ and is Boti/s 

 adipaloides, G. & R. Samea liparalis\, Walk., p. 354, and Botys Uie- 

 dialis, Walk., are synonyms of the same species. 



Asopia vahjalis'^, Walk., (nee Guen.) p. 364, belongs to Botys LftL 

 Part XVIIL— 1859. 



Botijs nffeUusalis, Walk,, p. 732=Botys ranalis (Guen.), This is 

 Bofi/s gracilis, G. & R., and is also described additionally by Mr. 

 Walker as Botys strictalis and Bofi/s olliusalis. 



Botys lacoalis, Walk., p. 733=Botys oxydalis. Guen. Also des- 

 cribed by Walker as Botys cincfipedalis. 



Spihdes helvialis. Walk., p. 772 belongs to Botys Led., and is 

 Botys citrina, G. & R. Also described by Mr. Walker under the 

 names of Botys thycesalis and Botys apertalis. 

 Part XIX.— 1859. 



Botys enphaesaJis. Walk., p. 1008=;Botys illibalis, (Riibn.') 



Among Mr. Walkers' descriptions in the Pyralidae are the follow- 

 ing which should be totally rejected for the reason that the specimens 

 upon which the species are founded are totally useless and irrecogniza- 

 ble from their defective condition : Scop>da orasusalis, S. ihoonalis, 

 S- stipatalis, S. caliginosalis, S. marginalis. 



Part XX.— 1860. 



Choerodes transducens, Walk., p. 18= % Eutrapela clemataria 

 (Smith) Hilbner. 



Choerodes traus/erens, Walk., p. 19^ ? Eutrapela clemataria (Smith) 

 Hiihner. 



Epione calipusaria. Walk., p. 120, belongs to Eurymene, Dup. 



Epione agyUaria, Walk., p. 121=Eurymene calipsusaria ( Walk^. 



Endropia refractaria'^ Walk., p. 151 = 9 Endropia hypochraria 

 (H-S.) Guen. 



Endropia, mestusata, Walk., p. 154= S Endropia hypochraria (H-S) 

 Guen. 



Endropia, liypoel\reiriM\ Walk., p. 15()=Endropia homuraria, n. s. 

 % . Closely allied to E. hypochraria and best described comparatively. 

 Fresh specimens are intense ferruginous above with purplish reflec- 

 tions, not clear brown with an olivaceous tinge as in its ally. Wings 

 narrower than in E. hypochraria and the angles of the external mar- 

 gins appear more determinate. Markings of the wings as in E. hypo- 

 chraria, but the dark broad shade which precedes the common postme- 

 dian line, is not so distinct as in its ally. Beneath, the wings are in- 



