290 Messrs. Parker and Jones on 



Fig. 3, Miliolal [VaginuUna'7) pusilla, is indeterminable. 

 Fig. 4, Nodosaria ? sicula, = two early chambers of a Nodo- 

 saria or, rather, of GlanduUna Icevigata. Fig. 5, Dentalina 

 sphceropJiora, is Nodosaria gracilis, D'Orb., after Soldani. 

 Fig. 6, Nodosaria leptosphcEra, is N. ovicida, like figs. 1 & 2, 

 in pi. XXV. II. B. Fig. 7, VaginuUna Hoffmanni, is one of the 

 simplest forms of V. laevigata, Roem. Fig. 8, Vag. ? tenuis^ is 

 indeterminable. Figs. 9 & 10, Textilaria glohulosa, /3. obtusa 

 (" T. gloh. 1838 "), = T. gihhosa. Figs. 11 & 12, Grammo- 

 stomum ? [Strophoconus ?) leptoderma, is Virgulina Sclireibersii. 

 Fig. 13, Oram, ajyicidatum, is Vulvulina pennatula (Batsch), 

 narrow variety, with aculeate ends to the chambers. Figs. 14 

 & 15, Gr. pliyllodeSy ■= Bolivina punctata. Fig. 16, Gr. sicu- 

 lum (" Text, aciculata, 1^38, in part"), is a rather broad Bol. 

 punctata. Fig. 17, Gr. jyolystigmaj is Text, sagittula. 



Fig. 18, Proroporus siculus, is probably Folgmorphina 

 Thouini. . Figs. 19, Gram, turio, 20, Strophoconus spicula, 

 21, Str. ovum, 22, Str. [Gram.'?) stiliger, 23, >S'ir.? (Gram.?) 

 acanthopus, and 24, /S'^r. ejflorescens, are Virgulina Hemprichii, 

 mostly very young ; and some are apiculate at the base. 

 Fig. 25, Stroph. teretiusculus ('?), is a Virgulina Schreihersii, 

 becoming biserial. Figs. 26, VaginuUna'^ paradoxa, and 

 27, V. ohscura, are cylindrical arcuate Virgulmoi Hemprichii, 

 such as are found in Jurassic clays, Gault, and Chalk. 



Fig. 28, Polymorphina uvula, =^P. prohlema. Figs. 29, Bi- 

 loculina'i incisa, 30, i?.? tenuis, and 31, 5.? integra, are young 

 (Adelosine) Quinquelocidince. Fig. 32, PlanuUna argulus, is 

 a Planorhidina glohulosa with large pores. Figs. 33, Rotalia 

 protolepta, 34, R. protacma-u, 35, P. glolndosa, and, 36, P. 

 quaternal (all " i?. glohulosa, 1838'*), are young individuals 

 and arrested forms of Planorhulina farcta. 



Fig. 37, PlanuUna leiopentas (?), yellow in colour, looks 

 like Pulvinulina Menardii ; but its pores are too large ; it may 

 be a Planorhulina near PI. Haidingerii. Fig. 38, Rotalia 

 leptosp)ira, yellow in tint, has the appearance of Pulvinulina 

 canariensis (D'Orb.), but is doubtful ; it also may be a Planor- 

 hulina. Figs. 39 & 40, PlanuUna porosa (" Rosalina Icevigata, 

 1838, in part ") is Planorhulina Haidingerii, subvar. ; and 

 41, a, Z>, PI. ocellata {^^ Rosalina ocellata, 1838") is almost 

 tlie same. 



Figs. 42, Planidina incurvata, and 43, PI. memhranacea, 

 are a young and an older specimen of Pulvinulina Menardii 

 (D'Orb.). Figs. 44, Glohigerina^ cretoi i^'' PiosaUna foveolata, 

 1838"), and 45, Gl. stellata ("compare Gl. lihani''''), are 

 Glohigerina hulloides, characteristic. Figs. 46, PlanuUna 

 angusta, and 47, PI. micromphala, =■ Planorhulina ammonoides, 



