406 Mr. 0. Thomas on 



subject, the present collection contains a fair number of 

 species not included in his lists, while, owing- to my having 

 been able to compare the remainder directly with typical 

 specimens from other localities, I have found it necessary to 

 describe several of those he mentions as local species or 

 subspecies. 



Dr. Ansorge has therefore to be congratulated on tlie 

 considerable number of new and interesting forms which his 

 collection has enabled me to discriminate. 



1. Miopithecus talapoin, Erxl. 

 S. 200. Canhoca. 



2. Eoiiseitus collaris, 111. 



$ . 40. Pungo Andongo. 



This specimen has a small third upper molar on each side. 



3. Epomophorus pusillus, Peters. 

 S . 195, 196. Canhoca. 



4. EpomopJiorus sp. 



S ■ 70. Pungo Andongo. 

 ? . 143. Braganza. 



5. Epomopliorus sp. 



cJ . G9 ; ? . 68, 124. Pungo Andongo. 

 ? . 138. Braganza. 



6. Hipposideros caffer, Sund. 

 ? . 5. Ambaca. 



7. Hipposideros Commersoni gigas, Wagn. 



? . 201. Canhoca. 



A note on the subspecies of H. Commersoni has been 

 recently published *. 



8. Nycteris sp. 



? . 58. Pungo Andongo. 



Closely similar, both in size and colour, to the type of 

 N. cethiopica luteola, Thos., from British East Africa, but 

 from the single skin I do not venture definitely to assign it 

 to that form. 



* Ann. & Mag. Nat. Hist., May 1904, p. 384. 



