in the British Museum. 433 



With tliese may perhaps be associated some of the species 

 placed by Westwood in his genus Lopaphus^ which, except 

 for the possession of wings, much resemble Lonchodince. 



Genus LOPAPHUS^ AVestw. 



Lopaplms, Westw. Cat. Phasm. p. 99 (1859) ; Wood-Mason, Journ. 



Asiatic See. Bengal, xlvi. p. 347 (1877). 

 Phasma, group 15, Haan, Temminck, Verhandel., Ortli. p. 125 (1842). 



As Westwood's genus corresponds to De Haan^s group 15, 

 one of the four species included in that group by De Haan 

 {Bojei, hrachyioterum, Macklottii, and galacpterum, H.) must 

 be regarded as the type. But Wood-Mason (supra) enume- 

 rates a series of species as belonging to Lopaphus, among 

 which hrachypterum is the only one of De Haan's included ; 

 and this consequently becomes the type. 



However, the other species placed by Wood- Mason in 

 Lopaphus are not congeneric, but belong to Gandaules, Stal, 

 and other genera. L. hrachypterus is probably allied to the 

 followina,- "enus. 



'£= t)^ 



Genus Ph^nopharos, nov. 



Antennoe nearly as long as the front legs and composed of 

 a great number of joints ; head with 4 or 5 tubercles behind, 

 and about as long as the pronotum ; mesonotum nearly one 

 third of the whole length of the body; median segment very 

 long, fully half as long as the metanotum ; legs very long; 

 front legs longest, middle legs shortest ; first joint of front 

 tarsi longer than the remaining joints together, and with a 

 lamellated crest at the extremity ; all the tibiae with two 

 spines towards the extremity on each lower carina ; hind 

 tibiae with a small basal lamina beneath on the inner side ; 

 tcgmina f^quaniiform. Wings hardly as long as the median 

 segment. 



Type, Lopaplius struthioneus^ Westw., from Singapore and 

 Penang. 



The three specimens of this genus in the Museum probably 

 represent two species ; but it will be better to wait for a longer 

 series before ditferentiatiiig them. 



Subfam. VII. Falopsinjs. 

 I have no observations to make on this subfamily. 



