ART. 1. MOSQUITOES OF THE UNITED STATES—DYAR. 13 
United States Records, 
Grorcia: Augusta, August 26, 1918 (W. H. Dumont). 
NortH CAROLINA: Charlotte, August 24, 1917 (H. P. Barret). 
Rockingham, September, 1921 (H. P. Barret). 
Jacksonville, July 21, 1920 (H. P. Barret). 
SoutH CARoLINA: Hartsville, June 24, 1914 (J. A. LePrince). 
TENNESSEE: Rives, July 27, 1804 (H. S. Barber). 
ARKANSAS: Scott, September and October, 1908 (J. K. Thibault). 
Little Rock, July 11, 1904 (H. S. Barber). 
MIssissipp1I: Jackson Barracks, October 16, 1920 (Army Medical Museum). 
Agricultural College, August 18, 1905 (W. V. Reed). 
Tutwiler, August 2, 1904 (H. 8S. Barber). 
Scott, May 5, 1915 (M. B. Mitzmain). 
CULEX (CHOEROPORPA) EGBERTI Dyar and Knab. 
Culex egberti Dyar and Knap, Journ. N. Y. Ent. Soe., vol. 15, p. 214, 1907. 
Culex (Mochlostyraxr) peribleptus Dyar and Knap, Ins. Ins. Mens., vol. 5, 
p. 181, 1917. 
A small dark mosquito, the mesonotum dark brown with traces of 
golden tint. Abdomen dark dorsally, with more or less distinct dor- 
sal white dots, especially on second segment, and white lateral spots. 
Venter black and white banded, but indistinctly. The markings are 
uncharacteristic, the species only to be certainly differentiated by 
the male genitalia. 
The larvae live in permanent water containing grass or other vege- 
tation. The habits of the adults have not been described. 
Distribution.—F lorida and the southern Atlantic and Gulf coasts. 
a 
United States Records. 
SouTH CaroLina: Parr Shoals, August 16, 1915 (T. D. H. Griffitts). 
Frormwa: Lake Okeechobee, January 1, 1906 (J. H. Egbert). 
Miami, November 1, 1921 (G. F. Moznette). 
Jacksonville, October 12, 1908 (H. Byrd). 
MississipP1: Sibley, July 27, 1921 (A. Fleming). 
CULEX (CHOEROPORPA) DEGUSTATOR Dyar. 
Culex (Choeroporpa) degustator Dyar, Ins. Ins. Mens., vol. 9, p. 39, 1921. 
A small blackish mosquito, the mesonotum dark brown with traces 
of golden tint. Abdomen dark dorsally, with white lateral spots. 
Venter black and white banded. The markings are uncharacteristic. 
This differs only slightly in genetalic characters from egberti. It 
may be considered as a local form or subspecies of this. The larva 
has not been described. 
Distribution.—Mississippi Valley. 
