Sy7i. — I. iciliiis, Heiv., I.e., fig. 3 ; Cupido ieiieus, Tepp., Trans. 

 R. Soc. S.A., IV., p. 29, t. 2, i. 9, 1882. 



Parkside (rare), Blackwood, Highbury, Belair, etc., November 

 to January. Most common at Belair in January. 



Ogykis, Westw. 

 25. O. OTANES, Feld. 



Reise Nov. Lep., II., p. 217, n. 234, t. 28, f. 1-3, I860 ; Tepp., 

 Tr. Roy. Soc. S.A., IV., p. 31, t. 2, f. 1, 1882 ; Tepp., male, 

 O. halmaturia, male, Nat. Ins. 8. A., part II., p. 12, 1890. 



Victor Harbor, Kangaroo Island, Yorketown. December to 

 February. Most common at Yorketown (frequenting " Mallee," 

 E. oleosa) in February. Miskin thought this might be a small 

 form of "Genovera," Heiv., but this is wrong. 



As will be noted above, the male is descril^ed as the male 

 " halmaturia." 



26. (). IDMO, lleiv. 



Cat. Lye, B. M., p. 2, n. 7, t. 1, f. 3, 4, 1850-52. 



Syn. — Male, O. halmaturia, Tepp., female, Nat. In. S.A., pt. II., 

 p. 12, 1890, 



Pt. Lincoln, two specimens, taken by the Rev. T. Blackburn, 

 also at Kangaroo Island, where Mr, Tepper informs me it is 

 common. 



As will be seen above, the male of this species has been de- 

 scribed as the female of 0. lialmaturia, Tepp., the description of 

 which tallies exactly w^th idmo, so that Tepper's name must rank 

 as synonymic. 



27. O. OR.ETES, Hew. 



Female, Cat. Lye, B. M., p. 3, n. 12, t. 1, f. 12, 13, 1862 ; male, 

 Tepp. Tr. Royal 80c. S.A., 1886 (O. amaryllis). 



Yorketown, Moonta, not uncommon, frequenting Eucalyptus 

 oleosa in February. I once obtained during November at Belair 

 chrysalides of this species under the bark of Eucalyptus rostrata^ 

 but was unable to rear them. 



27. O. Amaryllis, Hew. 



Female, Cat. Lye, B. M., p. 3, n. 11, t. 1, f. 5, 6, 1862 ; Tepper, 

 Tr. Roy. Soc. S.A., 1886; Miskin, male, Proc. Linn. Soc, N.S.W., 

 1890. 



Five specimens from Yorketown ; frequents Euc. oleosa. 



This and the previous species have been confused by Mr. 

 Teppei" in his paper of 1886 (Tr. Roy. Soc. S.A.) inasmuch that 

 after quoting Hewitson's (Newman's ?) description of the female 

 he proceeds and describes the male orcstes, Hew., as the male of 

 the present species. For further reference see Miskin's able 

 paper in Linn. Soc. of N.S.W. Proc, ser..2, V., p. 26, 1886. 



