219 
TiTINIA. 
As with many others of Mr. Pascoe's genera, there is 
really very little to distinguisli tins genus from MyUocfru!<, tiie 
sinuation at the base of the j^rothorax being practically one 
of degree only. I have referred but one new species to it, but 
several placed in MyUocerus might have been so referred, only 
that their femora are dentate, and tliis cliaracter (not tliat it 
is a very good one) I have regarded as a bar to the sj^ecies 
belonging to Titinid. 
TiTiNTA EREMiTA, Blackb., and ihcolor, Blackb. 
Specimens of both of these species were sent to me by 
Mr. Blackburn (his 469 and 3945) ; the two are very closely 
allied, but appear to be distinct on account of the first joint 
of the funicle being much longer than the second in f^rennta 
and not much longer in hirolor; in the former also there is a 
median whitish vitta on the 23rothorax, and that part is more 
parallel-sided. 
In the table Mr. Blackburn supplies"^ he divides the 
genus into two sections : — 
"A. Rostrum very narrow between the scrobes." 
"A A. Rostrum but little narrowed between the scrobes." 
These expressions are somewhat misleading, inasmuch as 
the width of the rostrum hctirt'e)i the scrobes is much the 
same in both sections;! in "A," however, the rostrum itself 
is almost continuously narrowed from the base to the apex, 
but in "AA" it is narrowed from the base, and then in- 
creases in width to the apex. But the upper surface of the 
rostrum between the scrobes is greatly constricted in both sec- 
tions. 
TlTINIA IGNARIA, PaSC. 
/Nf(/-//iorffff( , Pasc. 
I(fff(, Blackb. 
These names appear to appertain to but one species, 
tg?ia?'ia having been described from a female with the mark- 
ings but little pronounced; warmorata from a male (the male 
is always smaller than the female in this species, as in most, 
if not all, of the subfamily). lynaria was described as hav- 
ing the "head (the rostrum presumably included) without any 
traces of lines or excavations'" ; wannordta as having "capitis 
front e rostroqiie in medio Inira louy'itiuhndJder iw pres-sa.'^ 
This apparent difference, however, was probably due to the 
* P.L.S.N.S.W., 1892. p. 121. 
t At least in Imta, tenuis, and hrevicoJIis of A, and h'nolor and 
eremita of A A ; tlie appearance of thi8 .'^pace. moieover. varieis 
according to whether the scales have been abraded or not. 
