80 



1. T. Viridifasciata Harr., Ins. inj. Veg., 1st ed., 147. 

 (viKGixiAXA Fabr.) 



Acridlum viridifaxciatum De Geer, Mem., iii, 498, pi. 42, fig. 6 ; Ih., 

 Goeze, Gesch., iii, 325, pi. 42, fig. 6; Retz., Gen. et. Spec. Ins., 98. 



Gryllus (Locusta) viridifasciatus Goeze, Beytr., ii, 115. 



Locusta viridifasciata Harr., Catal., 56. 



Locusta {Tragocephala') viridifasciata Harr., Ins., inj. Veg., 1st. ed., 

 147; 2d ed., 158; 3d ed., 182, pi. 3, fig. 2. 



Gomphocerus viridifasciatus ULl., in Harr., Ins. inj. Veg., 3d ed., 



181. 



Tragocephala. viridifasciata Scudd., Bost. Journ. Nat. Hist., vii, 

 461 ; Thorn., Syn. Acrid. N. Am., 103, pi., fig. 3; Glov.,111. Orth. N. 

 Amer., pi. 5, fig. 9 ; Stal, Rec, Orth., i, 119. 



Gryllus virginianus Fabr., Syst. Ent., 291; lb.. Spec. Ins., i, 368; 

 lb., Ent. Syst., ii, 57; Turt., Linn. Syst. Nat., ii, 562. 



Gryllus {Locusta) virginiaims Goeze, Ent. Beytr., ii, 106 Gmel., 

 Linn. Syst. Nat., i, iv, 2078. 



Acridium virgirdanum Oliv., Encycl. meth., vi, 224. 



Acridium {CEdipoda) virgiiuanum De Haan, Bijdr. Kenn. Oith., 143. 



CEdipoda virginiana Burra., Handb. Ent., ii, 645. 



Gryllus {Locusta) Chrysomelas Gmel., Linn. Syst. Nat., i, iv, 2086; 

 Turt., Linn. Syst. Nat., ii, 569. 



Acridium marginatum Oliv., Encycl. meth., vi, 229. 



Acridium hemipterum Pal. de Beauv., Ins., 145, pi. 4, fig. 3. 

 (iNFUSCATA Harr.) 



Locusta {Tragocephala) iufuscata Harr., Ins. inj. Veg., 1st ed., 147; 

 2ded., 158, 3d ed., 181. 



Gompliocerus irfuscatus Uhl., in Harr., Ins. inj. Veg., 3d ed., 181 ; 



Tragocephala infuscata Scudd., Bost. Journ. Nat. Hist., vii, 461. 

 Thom., Syn. Acrid. N. Am., 102, pi., fig. 7 ; Glov., 111., Orth., pi. 10, 

 fig. 10; Scudd., Geol. N. Hampsh., i, 373. 



Locusta radiata Harr., Cat. 56. 



Locusta {Tragocephala) radiata Harr., Ins. inj. Veg., 1st ed., 148 ; 

 2ded., 159; 3d ed., 183. 



Gomphocerus radiatus Uhl., in Harr., Ins. inj. Veg., 3d ed., 181. 



This species is not only exceedingly variable, but presents us with 

 an interesting case of dimorphism, which also appears to be I'e- 

 peated in T. cuhensis. The two forms, for which the names virgin- 

 iana and infuscata are retained, differ from each other in the pres- 

 ence (in the former) or absence (in the latter) of bright green colors ; 



