2 
united into one piece would have to be included in it: I therefore hat 
pose to place it as an aberrant species of Caralluma.—N. E. Bro 
A.—C, aperta. Fig. 1. Corona, side view. 2, Pollinia. Both enlarged. 
Besides those species of Caralluma enumerated above, Sir Henry 
Barkly sent three others apparently belonging to this genus, but with- 
out flowers, so that I am unable to determine them with certainty ; 
they are— 
“Sale ot i ee Little Namaqualand, possibly the same as 
0. 47, OC. a 
No. 46, rithot locality, is probably CO. mammillar 
No. I., ‘growing in large clumps in the coats at a ere: 
called the Dra, division of Worcester.’ A new species.—N. E. Bro 
B.—Huernia humilis, Haw. Synop. Plant. Succ. p. 30 (1812).— 
Stapelia contra Masson, Stap. p. 10, t. 5 (1796). 
Has. peg in the Nieuwveld Mountains by Mr. Bain, and 
sent home by Sir H. - ey as “ Bain X.” I have not seen the 
sage plant. ok, E. Bro 
B.—H. suminus. Fig. 3. Section th t Corelle 
5. Pollinin, All enlarg sad ion through the annulus of the corolla, 4. Coro 
TRICHOCAULON, N. E. Br. 
T. cactiformis, N. E. Br.—Stapelia cactiformis, Hook. Bot. Mag.t. 4127. 
Has. Little Namaqualand. Barkly (No. 37). 
Although differing g from the other species of Trichocaulon in the 
Paterson, in his Narrative of four Journies in 
to the country of the — 
en and beer nck the plate of Stapelia following that of 
tp. 
£ ee ein N. E. Br. in Journ. Linn. Soc, vol. 17, p. 165, pl. 1, 
Has. Karoo, Bain; Barkly (drawing No. 15). 
—* fine plant from the Vaal River, of what I believe to have been 
species, was sent to Kew by Sir H. Barkly in 1877, but it died — 
