LIY 



CASES RELATING TO ABOVE SUBJECT MATTES. 



As to acquisition ot a sevetlil right of fishery by proscrip- 

 tion. 



See Day t'^- Corsueh vs. Day, 4 Md. Eep., 2C2. 



Del*. iS: Md. E. R. Co.. vs.. Stump, 8 G. .^: J., 479. 

 Tho patentee of land covered by navigable water can only 

 claim in subordination to the rights of the public of fishery 

 and navigation. 



Hammond's Lessee rs, Inloes, 4 Md. Rep., 138. 

 See, also. Chapman i>^ Hoskins, 2 Md. Ch, Dee., 485; 

 And, Patterson, et aL, rs. Gelston, 23 Md. Rep., 445. 

 As to fishing on the Potomac with Gill Net^s : 



The State t>\ Hoofman, 9 Md. Rep., 28. 

 Georgetown vs. Alex. Car. Co..,. 12 Pet,, 95. 

 Binnev's Case, 2B1., 125„ 



