﻿( 
  50 
  ) 
  

  

  II. 
  The 
  synonymy 
  and 
  types 
  of 
  certain 
  genera 
  of 
  Hymeno- 
  

   ptera, 
  especially 
  of 
  those 
  discussed 
  by 
  the 
  Rev. 
  F. 
  D. 
  

   Morice 
  and 
  Mr. 
  Jno. 
  Hartley 
  Durrant 
  in 
  connection 
  

   with 
  the 
  long 
  -forgotten 
  " 
  Erlangen 
  List 
  " 
  of 
  Panzer 
  and 
  

   Jurine. 
  By 
  J. 
  Chester 
  Bradley, 
  M.S., 
  Ph.D., 
  

   Assistant 
  Professor 
  of 
  Systematic 
  Entomology 
  in 
  

   Cornell 
  University, 
  Ithaca, 
  N.Y. 
  Communicated 
  by 
  

   C. 
  Gordon 
  Hewitt, 
  D.Sc, 
  

  

  [Read 
  February 
  5th, 
  1919.] 
  

  

  The 
  two 
  authors 
  mentioned 
  in 
  the 
  title 
  in 
  two 
  compara- 
  

   tively 
  recent 
  joint 
  papers 
  (1914, 
  1916) 
  which 
  were 
  read 
  

   before 
  the 
  Society 
  respectively 
  on 
  December 
  3rd, 
  1913, 
  and 
  

   November 
  1st, 
  1916, 
  have 
  brought 
  to 
  light 
  and 
  discussed 
  

   with 
  great 
  detail 
  a 
  long-forgotten 
  review, 
  pubhshed 
  

   anonymously, 
  of 
  Jurine's 
  " 
  Nouvelle 
  Methode 
  de 
  Classer 
  

   les 
  Hymenopteres 
  et 
  les 
  Dipteres."' 
  

  

  This 
  interesting 
  review 
  appeared 
  some 
  years 
  in 
  advance 
  

   of 
  the 
  actual 
  pubHcation 
  of 
  Jurine's 
  great 
  work. 
  Morice 
  

   and 
  Durrant 
  have 
  clearly 
  shown 
  that 
  its 
  real 
  author 
  was 
  

   Panzer, 
  but 
  that 
  the 
  hst 
  of 
  genera 
  which 
  he 
  included 
  in 
  

   connection 
  with 
  it 
  was 
  transcribed 
  to 
  all 
  intents 
  and 
  

   purpose 
  directly 
  from 
  advance 
  proofs 
  furnished 
  by 
  Jurine, 
  

   with 
  whom 
  Panzer 
  was 
  in 
  frequent 
  correspondence. 
  

   Although, 
  as 
  a 
  book 
  review, 
  the 
  work 
  was 
  anonymous, 
  the 
  

   fact 
  that 
  it 
  plainly 
  stated 
  that 
  it 
  was 
  reviewing 
  Jurine's 
  

   work, 
  that 
  the 
  author 
  makes 
  no 
  claims 
  for 
  himself 
  but 
  gives 
  

   entire 
  credit 
  for 
  everything 
  published 
  to 
  Jurine, 
  makes 
  it 
  

   seem 
  imperative 
  to 
  recognise 
  the 
  pubhcation 
  as 
  vahd, 
  and 
  

   to 
  ascribe 
  the 
  hst 
  of 
  genera, 
  as 
  Morice 
  and 
  Durrant 
  suggest, 
  

   to 
  Jurine. 
  In 
  other 
  words, 
  the 
  case 
  is 
  not 
  essentially 
  dif- 
  

   ferent 
  from 
  what 
  it 
  would 
  have 
  been 
  if 
  Jurine 
  had 
  pubhshed 
  

   over 
  his 
  own 
  signature 
  an 
  advance 
  synopsis 
  of 
  the 
  genera 
  

   which 
  he 
  proposed 
  to 
  adopt 
  in 
  his 
  forthcoming 
  work. 
  

  

  This 
  review 
  seems 
  to 
  have 
  been 
  known 
  to 
  certain 
  con- 
  

   temporaries 
  of 
  Panzer 
  and 
  Jurine, 
  and 
  to 
  have 
  influenced 
  

   their 
  own 
  subsequently 
  published 
  work, 
  but 
  unfortunately 
  

   was 
  soon 
  forgotten 
  by 
  the 
  Entomological 
  public, 
  doubtless 
  

  

  TRANS. 
  ENT. 
  SOC. 
  LOND. 
  1919. 
  — 
  PARTS 
  I, 
  II. 
  (JULY) 
  

  

  